"I think Maus I is better than Maus II. The standard here is whether or not it's as good as a great book of prose literature and by that standard, no, it's not that great"

In this quote, Ted Rall is revealing his opinion that Maus I is much better than Maus II. He is recommending that the requirement for judging the quality of Maus must be the very same as for evaluating a terrific book of prose literature. He is implying that, by this standard, Maus is not as good as a great book of prose literature. This recommends that, while Maus is a good book, it does not reach the same level of quality as a great book of prose literature. Rall's viewpoint is that Maus I is better than Maus II, however that neither of them reach the very same level of quality as a terrific book of prose literature.