"One would expect that private property taken by eminent domain would become land available for public use such as parks and roads. Unfortunately, this decision creates a loophole for government to manipulate the definition of public use simply to generate greater tax revenue"

This quote by Jim Ryun suggests that using distinguished domain to take personal property is not always utilized for the public great. It indicates that the government might be benefiting from the definition of public use to create more tax profits, rather than utilizing the land for public use such as parks and roadways. This is worrying as it suggests that the federal government is not constantly acting in the best interests of the public, however rather in its own interests. It is necessary that the government is held responsible for its actions and that it is not allowed to control the meaning of public usage for its own gain.