Skip to main content

Barnett Newman Biography Quotes 3 Report mistakes

3 Quotes
Occup.Artist
FromUSA
BornJanuary 29, 1905
New York City, New York, United States
DiedJuly 4, 1970
New York City, New York, United States
Causeheart attack
Aged65 years
Early Life and Education
Barnett Newman was born in New York City in 1905 to immigrant parents and grew up in a milieu shaped by the ambitions and anxieties of a first-generation American family. He studied at the City College of New York, where he developed an enduring interest in philosophy, literature, and the natural sciences alongside art. He also took classes at art schools in the city and sustained himself through teaching and work connected to his family's business. From the outset he understood painting not as craft alone but as a rigorous intellectual activity. The cosmopolitan, argumentative atmosphere of New York in the interwar years sharpened his appetite for debate and positioned him to be an articulate participant in the postwar redefinition of American art.

Becoming an Artist-Writer
Before his signature style emerged, Newman drew, painted, wrote criticism, and organized discussions. He was active among artists and thinkers who were reimagining what a painting could do and mean. In the late 1940s he helped establish the short-lived but influential Subjects of the Artist school with Mark Rothko, Robert Motherwell, William Baziotes, and David Hare. Their lectures and seminars, attended by peers and critics alike, created a setting for the exchange of ideas that would underwrite Abstract Expressionism. Newman's own essays, including the frequently cited The Sublime is Now, announced his conviction that art should rescue the sublime from historical nostalgia and recast it as an immediate, existential experience. His prose was unapologetically bold, challenging critics such as Clement Greenberg to consider painting as more than formalist arrangement and conversing implicitly with Harold Rosenberg's notion of action painting.

Breakthrough and the Zip
Newman's decisive breakthrough arrived when he began to build canvases as expansive fields animated by a single, incisive vertical band he later called a zip. Onement I, a painting he completed in 1948, is often cited as the first fully achieved example. The zip does not merely divide a field; it measures it, ignites it, and makes the surrounding color breathe with a new intensity. Through this device Newman pursued presence rather than depiction. Paintings such as Vir Heroicus Sublimis underscored his belief that scale matters because it envelopes the viewer, producing a bodily encounter with color and space rather than a distant reading of an image. He even encouraged visitors in early exhibitions to stand close, to be inside the picture, rather than to scan it from afar as if it were a window.

Community and Debate
Newman's emergence unfolded alongside the ascent of peers who would become synonymous with Abstract Expressionism: Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning, Franz Kline, Adolph Gottlieb, Clyfford Still, Rothko, and Motherwell. Their gatherings in downtown studios and clubs fostered a culture of arguments about content, gesture, and scale. Newman showed with the dealer Betty Parsons, whose gallery was a crucible for the movement at a time when official institutions lagged behind. He found a powerful advocate in Thomas B. Hess, the editor and critic who wrote about his art with unusual sympathy. Others were skeptical. Some critics dismissed the broad fields and zips as overly simple, mistaking reduction for emptiness. Newman welcomed serious criticism, insisting that the seeming spareness of his surfaces concentrated feeling rather than evacuated it.

Major Works and Themes
Throughout the 1950s and 1960s Newman deepened his investigation into what a canvas could register as experience. The Stations of the Cross: Lema Sabachthani, a sequence of stark black-and-white paintings developed over several years, distilled his thinking about tragedy, questioning, and faith without illustrating any narrative. He turned repeatedly to archetypal titles drawn from myth and scripture, not to signal belief in a specific doctrine but to frame the paintings as meditations on origins, creation, and human courage. In the later Who's Afraid of Red, Yellow and Blue works, he explored how pure chroma and a few measured bands could carry the drama of painting into an arena of visceral immediacy.

Newman also worked in sculpture and printmaking. The monumental Broken Obelisk reimagined an ancient form as an object of modern aspiration and fracture; one prominent installation was associated with the Rothko Chapel in Houston and dedicated to the memory of Martin Luther King, Jr., linking Newman's austere formal language to public mourning and civic hope. His suite of prints, including the Cantos, translated his sensibility into the graphic medium through disciplined intervals and calibrations of tone.

Method and Philosophy
Newman's procedures were painstaking despite the apparent simplicity of the result. He calibrated the proportion of canvas to zip, the temperature of color to the penetration of line, and the satin or matte quality of a surface to the desired optical and emotional effect. He rejected the idea that painting should be dominated by skillful depiction of objects. Instead, he argued for painting as an arena of creation in the strongest sense, a space where a painter might achieve the condition of newness. His reading in philosophy and his conversations with artists and critics kept him alert to language, but he resisted letting theory eclipse the raw encounter with the work.

Reception and Influence
By the 1960s Newman's art had gained wider visibility in New York and abroad. The debate around his reductive means became part of a larger conversation about the direction of postwar painting. Younger artists associated with Minimalism and post-painterly abstraction, among them Donald Judd, Frank Stella, and others, saw in Newman a precedent for clarity of means, direct address, and rigorous attention to scale. Color Field painters, including Helen Frankenthaler and Morris Louis, extended the implications of broad chromatic expanses that he had so decisively asserted. Even artists outside painting, such as the sculptor David Smith, intersected with Newman's concerns about monumentality and the charged relationship between viewer and work.

Personal Life
Newman married Annalee Newman, a forceful presence in his life and work. She supported his studio practice, helped manage his exhibitions, and later safeguarded his legacy with resolve and intelligence. Friends, fellow artists, and critics were regular visitors to his studio, where he was by turns argumentative and generous, always ready to defend the stakes of his art. He worked in New York almost exclusively, convinced that the city's energy sustained the seriousness and ambition he demanded of himself.

Late Career and Final Years
Newman's later years were marked by sustained productivity and growing recognition. He continued to experiment with how a zip might operate as interval, incision, or light, and how a saturated field could be at once empty of depiction and full of presence. Major exhibitions brought his work to larger audiences, and public installations of his sculptures demonstrated that his principles extended beyond the canvas. He remained unwavering in his claim that the objective of his art was not decoration or formal novelty but the staging of the sublime as a contemporary possibility.

Death and Legacy
Barnett Newman died in 1970 in New York. In the years that followed, retrospectives and scholarly studies consolidated his place as one of the central figures of postwar American art. Annalee Newman and close allies ensured that the archive of writings, drawings, and paintings was preserved and made available to researchers and curators. His paintings continue to provoke strong reactions: they demand time, proximity, and openness to an encounter that is more like standing before an event than looking at a picture. The convinced intensity of his project, shaped in dialogue and sometimes in dispute with colleagues such as Rothko, Pollock, de Kooning, Still, and critics including Greenberg, Rosenberg, and Hess, helped define what an American painter could attempt after the war. Newman left behind not only canonical works but a model of artistic seriousness in which a few vertical inches of paint could transform the space of a room and the state of a viewer.

Our collection contains 3 quotes who is written by Barnett, under the main topics: Art.

3 Famous quotes by Barnett Newman