Edwin Percy Whipple Biography Quotes 1 Report mistakes
Early Life and Self-EducationEdwin Percy Whipple was born in Gloucester, Massachusetts, in 1819, and came of age at a time when New England was shaping an American literary identity. Without the advantage of a university education, he educated himself through voracious reading and steady work in Boston, where access to libraries and the energy of the city s lecture culture mattered as much as any formal schooling. In counting rooms and offices by day and in reading rooms by night, he formed the habits of discipline and wide reference that would distinguish his criticism. The world of books and the practical world of commerce met in him early, and that combination gave his essays their characteristic mix of moral gravity, historical example, and rhetorical clarity.
Entry into Letters and the Lyceum
Whipple first gained notice as a lecturer on the New England lyceum circuit, the network of winter lectures that brought literature, history, and civic topics to general audiences. Clear, compact, and animated, his platform style made him a favorite in Boston and beyond. From the platform he moved naturally into periodical writing, contributing essays and reviews to leading journals. When he gathered his early pieces into the collections known as Essays and Reviews, readers across the country recognized in him a critic who could make literature intelligible without reducing it, and who treated the moral and civic stakes of reading as integral to the pleasures of style. His success in the lyceum linked him to other public intellectuals of the era, among them Ralph Waldo Emerson and George William Curtis, with whom he shared venues and audiences.
Critic of Character and Literature
Whipple s most characteristic pieces were portraits: of authors, public men, and the epochs that shaped them. He wrote often about the way character and talent are formed by circumstance, a theme that ran through volumes such as Character and Characteristic Men and Success and Its Conditions. He was especially drawn to the English Renaissance, returning in lectures and essays to Shakespeare and his contemporaries in what he issued as The Literature of the Age of Elizabeth. Across these books he balanced admiration for genius with demands of conscience, arguing that literary art and public virtue illuminate one another. His sentences, rhythmic and emphatic, drew frequent comparison to the English historian Macaulay, yet his examples were grounded in American experience and the republican ideal.
Boston Circles and Collaborations
Based in Boston, Whipple moved among the writers and publishers who gave the city its mid-nineteenth-century prominence. He was associated with the circle that gathered around the publishers Ticknor and Fields and contributed to the pages of major Boston-based journals, including the Atlantic Monthly. In that world he was a colleague and friend of figures such as Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr., James Russell Lowell, and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, who, like Whipple, believed that literature could refine taste and strengthen civic sense. Through the convivial gatherings of the Saturday Club he met and debated with Charles Sumner, Emerson, and others who made Boston s intellectual life a national force. The editor James T. Fields, a pivotal connector of authors and audiences, helped bring Whipple s essays to a broad readership, and in turn relied on Whipple s steady judgment as a reviewer.
Public Questions and the National Crisis
The decades of Whipple s maturity coincided with sectional conflict and the Civil War, and his criticism did not stand apart from those concerns. He wrote about the responsibilities of statesmen and the tests of national character, addressing topics that touched directly on union, freedom, and the ethical claims of citizenship. His lectures in these years, while literary in form, were heard as contributions to public debate. He respected the eloquence of orators and the power of books to sway conduct, and he took as models both American and English examples to show how a free people might cultivate intelligence without losing moral purpose. In this he shared common ground with Lowell and Emerson, who also saw criticism as a mode of citizenship.
Methods, Style, and Influence
Whipple s method was comparative and historical. He set authors in their times, weighing temperament and training against the pressure of events, and drew bright, quotable summaries of a writer s distinctive qualities. He prized clarity and a cogent arrangement of facts, preferring the outline and the moral inference to the fragment or riddle. While he could be sharp in judgment, he was not a specialist s specialist; his ambition was to reach the general reader who wanted both orientation and evaluation. Teachers and editors adopted his essays because they modeled a way to read closely without pedantry. That approach helped define an American tradition of public criticism in which the reviewer s responsibility included educating taste, preserving standards, and welcoming new talent.
Relations with Contemporary Authors
Whipple read, reviewed, and lectured on a broad range of authors, from Shakespeare and the Elizabethans to modern novelists and historians. He was attentive to transatlantic currents, discussing Charles Dickens and other English writers whose popularity in the United States made them common reference points in the lecture hall. At home he took up the work of American contemporaries, among them Nathaniel Hawthorne, and weighed their claims with an eye to the formation of a national literature. His friendships in Boston brought him into frequent conversation with Holmes, Longfellow, and Lowell; he corresponded within those networks and was a familiar presence at gatherings where manuscripts, reputations, and public questions were tested in vigorous talk.
Later Years and Continuing Work
As the postwar decades unfolded, Whipple maintained a steady rhythm of lectures and essays. He revised earlier pieces, prepared new collections, and continued to contribute to the journals that had shaped his reputation. The growth of universities and specialization in scholarship began to change the literary landscape, but Whipple s audience remained the educated general public, and his books continued to find readers in homes and libraries. Even as tastes shifted, his portraits of character and his surveys of literary epochs retained value for their lucidity and sense of proportion.
Death and Legacy
Whipple died in 1886, and Boston newspapers marked his passing with tributes that emphasized both his gifts as a critic and the personal loyalty he inspired among friends. He left a body of work that helped define the possibilities of American literary criticism before the age of academic professionalization. His essays made the conversation of the Boston parlors and clubs available to a national audience; they linked pleasure in style to principles of conduct; and they taught readers to see literature in history and history in literature. Among his contemporaries and successors, from Fields to Holmes and Lowell, there was wide agreement that Whipple s clarity, consistency, and humane interest in character set a standard for critical writing. In the longer view, his career illuminates an American moment when the lecture platform, the monthly magazine, and the publishing house collaborated to make criticism a civic art.
Our collection contains 1 quotes who is written by Edwin, under the main topics: Self-Discipline.