Ernest Newman Biography Quotes 3 Report mistakes

Early Life and Education
Ernest Newman was born in Liverpool in 1868, and the path that led him to become England's preeminent music critic began outside the academy. He first trained for a conventional career and worked in commerce, but he pursued music and literature with an autodidact's intensity, teaching himself languages in order to read European criticism and composer correspondence at first hand. Early on he wrote under his birth name, William Roberts, before adopting the professional name by which he became known. The practical discipline of his day job, together with a voracious private study of German sources and musical history, shaped a critic who would later insist on evidence, clear argument, and freedom from fashionable cant.

First Steps in Criticism
Newman's earliest articles appeared in newspapers and journals during the 1890s, and almost immediately he gravitated to subjects that would define his long career: opera, the psychology of the creative artist, and the dismantling of grand myths that had accreted around great composers. He began to publish books at a brisk pace, including studies on Christoph Willibald Gluck and, most fatefully, on Richard Wagner. His Wagner essays already displayed a tone that would become his hallmark: dryly skeptical, alert to contradiction, yet sympathetic to musical imagination when it survived scrutiny.

Birmingham Years and Expanding Influence
By the early twentieth century Newman had established himself as a working critic of authority, notably at The Birmingham Post. The Birmingham years were formative: the city's vigorous musical life, and the presence of figures such as the composer Granville Bantock, widened his sympathies beyond the German canon and sharpened his views on how orchestral and choral institutions actually functioned. He listened closely to British music as it sought its modern voice, writing about contemporaries such as Edward Elgar and Frederick Delius with a mixture of admiration and reserve that earned him both friends and adversaries. His prose, taut and unornamented, gave readers the sense of being addressed by a mind unwilling to flatter taste or fashion.

London, The Sunday Times, and Mature Voice
In 1920 Newman became chief music critic of The Sunday Times, a position he held for decades. From London he covered Covent Garden's opera seasons, orchestral series, and the burgeoning concert life shaped by conductors such as Sir Thomas Beecham and, at the BBC, Adrian Boult. Week after week he championed precision in performance and textual fidelity, and he castigated slovenly rehearsals, inflated reputations, and program-note mythology. Younger writers, among them Neville Cardus, learned from his example that criticism could combine literary economy with a scholar's scruple for sources. Newman's readers trusted him to explain not only what they were hearing but what lay behind a score's claims on the listener.

Scholarship on Wagner and Other Writings
Newman's international reputation rests above all on his multivolume The Life of Richard Wagner, issued between the 1930s and the late 1940s. It was conceived not as hagiography but as a documentary inquiry: he sifted letters, diaries, and contemporary reportage, collated conflicting testimonies, and used his command of German materials to disentangle legend from fact. The result was a portrait of Wagner that was more intricate than either unconditional worship or blanket condemnation could allow, and it remains a standard point of reference. Alongside Wagner he published monographs on Gluck, Hugo Wolf, and Richard Strauss, and he collected his theater pieces in volumes that captured the feel of the opera house from the stalls, bringing to the page the immediacy of first nights and the long view of repertory. His books drew audiences far beyond Britain, shaping English-language discourse on nineteenth- and early twentieth-century music.

Method, Style, and Controversies
Newman's method was consistent. He distrusted large, untested generalizations and asked for chapter and verse. He believed that a critic's duty was owed first to the reader and to the work under scrutiny, not to a national school or a fashionable movement. That stance led him into periodic storms. Champions of Elgar bristled at reviews that declined to confer automatic masterpiece status; devotees of Delius protested when he separated sensuous surface from structural substance. Admirers of Wagner sometimes balked at the coolness with which he set out the composer's inconsistencies in life and art. Yet many musicians valued his candor. Beecham, a commanding personality who enjoyed verbal fencing, could taste the asperity of Newman's columns; but the two also recognized in each other a commitment to raising standards and a lifelong devotion to the stage.

Personal Life and Circle
Newman's domestic and artistic life were deeply enriched by his marriage to the pianist-composer Hope Squire. She was a formidable musician in her own right, an advocate of new music, and a presence at recitals and salons that gathered performers, composers, and critics. Their discussions, performances, and shared projects formed a sounding board for his ideas about interpretation and musical communication. Through such circles Newman moved in proximity to the principal actors of British musical life, from Bantock to Elgar and Delius, and to conductors whose work he tracked over decades, including Beecham and Boult. He also maintained a lasting engagement with the Wagner world, attending performances and keeping abreast of developments at Bayreuth while he refined the arguments of his books.

War Years, Resilience, and Later Career
The interruptions and anxieties of two world wars did not silence Newman. He maintained his weekly discipline through blackouts and rationing, analyzing the repertory that wartime Britain could still mount and treating radio as an extension of the concert hall rather than a substitute for it. During and after the Second World War he continued to issue major volumes, including the later installments of The Life of Richard Wagner. The combination of a daily journalist's stamina with a historian's patience set him apart: he could file a lucid review on a Saturday and spend months verifying a footnote that unsettled an inherited legend.

Legacy
Ernest Newman died in 1959, having written to the very end of his life. He left behind an archive of reviews and books that altered expectations of what music criticism could be in English. He demonstrated that it could be independent without being contrarian, scholarly without pedantry, and readable without oversimplification. Performers respected his exacting ear; readers recognized a voice that insisted on clarity and evidence; younger critics absorbed his insistence that a critic must be both servant and skeptic of the art he loves. Above all, his Wagner scholarship remains a monument of careful inquiry. Through the people whose work he examined and often challenged, composers such as Richard Wagner, Edward Elgar, and Frederick Delius; conductors like Sir Thomas Beecham and Adrian Boult; and colleagues including Neville Cardus and Granville Bantock in the broader cultural milieu, Newman helped to define the twentieth-century conversation about how we listen, what we value, and why the stories we tell about music must be tested against the music itself.

Our collection contains 3 quotes who is written by Ernest, under the main topics: Witty One-Liners - Work Ethic.