Richard Corliss Biography Quotes 4 Report mistakes
Early Life and BeginningsRichard Corliss (1944, 2015) emerged from the postwar American landscape with a deep curiosity about language and moving images. As a young reader he sunk into novels, theater, and magazines, and as a young viewer he fell for the energy of popular cinema as well as the rigor of film history. He began writing criticism while still very young, honing a voice that was playful, allusive, and exacting. Early work in small publications and cinephile journals taught him how to balance enthusiasm with skepticism and how to frame a movie within broader currents of culture, literature, and craft.
Film Comment and a Critical Voice
Corliss first rose to prominence in the 1970s at Film Comment, the magazine of the Film Society of Lincoln Center, where he served as a leading editor and writer. In that role he helped the journal become a home for deep reporting, long-form interviews, and spirited debates about what movies mean and how they are made. He broadened its gaze to include Hollywood studios, European modernists, and emerging Asian cinemas, always tracing how production realities influenced artistic results. He cultivated writers and argued for criticism that could be both learned and accessible. The magazine under his stewardship reflected a conviction that film culture thrives when critics engage with producers, screenwriters, technicians, and audiences alike.
Champion of Screenwriters
One of Corliss's most enduring contributions was insisting that the screenwriter belongs at the center of any conversation about American film. His book "Talking Pictures: Screenwriters in the American Cinema" pressed against a narrow view of the director as sole author, restoring attention to the story architects who shape character, structure, and tone. Without rejecting directors or cinematographers, he showed how the best films often arise from a complex negotiation among collaborators. That idea radiated through his essays and interviews, which regularly highlighted dialogue, narrative construction, and the rhythms of genre.
Time Magazine and National Reach
In 1980 he joined Time, where he became one of the magazine's defining critical voices. From that perch he reached a vast general readership, filing weekly reviews, festival dispatches, year-end lists, and cover stories. He could anatomize a mainstream blockbuster and, next week, champion a little-known import. His pieces were brisk yet layered, full of historical memory, wordplay, and a feel for show-business realities. Alongside his friend and colleague Richard Schickel, he helped shape Time's cinematic canons, including the widely discussed All-TIME 100 Movies list. For decades Corliss walked the Croisette at Cannes, surveyed Toronto and other festivals, and sent back reports that linked the energy of the moment to a longer arc of film history.
Subjects, Colleagues, and a Global Curiosity
Corliss cast a wide net in the people he wrote about. He profiled and interviewed filmmakers across generations, from studio-era legends to contemporary directors whose styles reshaped the medium. He covered figures like Martin Scorsese, Steven Spielberg, Clint Eastwood, and Ang Lee, and he explored the ascendancy of animation and the storytelling rigor of studios such as Pixar. He also gave serious attention to films from Hong Kong, mainland China, Japan, and South Korea, helping anglophone readers encounter artists who were transforming action, melodrama, and modernist narrative. In the world of criticism, he conversed with and sometimes debated contemporaries like Pauline Kael and Andrew Sarris, part of a larger dialogue that kept American film writing argumentative, self-aware, and alive to new ideas.
Books, Essays, and Historical Interests
Beyond weekly reviews, Corliss published books and essays that mapped his wide interests. He wrote about star images and performance, returning to classical Hollywood icons to ask how glamour, persona, and publicity shape audience desire. He contributed to volumes and retrospectives that reconsidered canonical films and underappreciated genres. His study of Vladimir Nabokov's "Lolita" for a film-classics series showed the precision he brought to adaptation: attentive to literary nuance yet alert to the tactility of images, music, and editing. Across formats he resisted the temptation to freeze cinema into fixed hierarchies, arguing instead for a living canon subject to revision.
Style and Approach
Corliss wrote with a critic's exactness and a fan's delight. He liked puns and surprising metaphors, but he disliked glibness; he sought to make a point quickly and then deepen it with context. He loved staging lively arguments, often in conversation with colleagues at Time and Film Comment, because he believed that movies are social artifacts whose meanings are worked out in public. He was neither a cynic nor a soft touch. A flawed film would get a measured critique; a great one, an essay that could open doors for viewers while honoring the mystery of art. He prized craft: editing rhythms, musical choices, the way production design can carry theme, the way a well-written scene can turn a plot.
Personal Life and Partnerships
Corliss married Mary Corliss, a respected presence in New York's film world, whose work at the Museum of Modern Art's Department of Film deepened their shared engagement with cinema history. Their partnership was a long conversation about movies: prints and programs, archives and new releases, the continuity between silent images and digital spectacle. Friends and colleagues often encountered them at screenings and museum events, a pair of devoted cinephiles whose professional paths overlapped in their advocacy for viewing, preserving, and discussing film.
Influence and Mentorship
As an editor and senior critic, Corliss encouraged younger writers, both in the pages of Film Comment and through his example at Time. He believed criticism was a craft that could be taught through careful edits and spirited debate. Writers who came up reading him admired his generosity with references and his insistence that a broad public deserves clear, stylish, and informed writing about art. Filmmakers, too, recognized that even when he disliked a work, he tried to understand what it was trying to do, and to judge it on those terms.
Final Years and Legacy
Corliss worked at full tilt deep into his final years, filing festival reports, weighing in on awards seasons, and revisiting classics in essays that invited fresh viewings. He died in 2015, and tributes poured in from colleagues at Time, from collaborators and peers across the critical landscape, and from filmmakers who had found in his pieces both scrutiny and support. Readers remembered the way he could make a film snap into focus in a single paragraph, and how he made the case, again and again, that movies are worth taking seriously because they are how a culture dreams in public. His legacy rests in pages of reviews and in a set of values: curiosity, historical memory, openness to popular art, and a conviction that, in the right hands, criticism can be its own form of storytelling.
Our collection contains 4 quotes who is written by Richard, under the main topics: Witty One-Liners - Art - Movie.