Roland Freisler Biography Quotes 2 Report mistakes

Early Life and Education
Roland Freisler was born on 30 October 1893 in Celle, in the German Empire. After secondary school he served in the First World War, fighting on the Eastern Front. He was captured by Russian forces and spent years as a prisoner of war, an experience during which he acquired fluency in Russian and worked as an interpreter in the camp. Following his release and the end of the war, he studied law and completed the qualifications necessary for legal practice during the early years of the Weimar Republic. He entered the profession at a time when German politics and the legal system were unsettled by revolution, economic crisis, and polarization.

Entry into Public Life
In the 1920s and early 1930s Freisler combined legal work with growing political activism in the National Socialist movement. Like a number of lawyers disillusioned by the perceived weaknesses of parliamentary democracy, he promoted a vision of criminal law that would prioritize the interests of the state over traditional protections for defendants. He gained a reputation as a fierce polemicist who linked jurisprudence to ideology, arguing that courts should apply the criminal law according to what he later called the healthy sentiment of the people rather than long-established legal standards.

Power and the Nazification of Justice
After Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, the legal profession and the courts were rapidly brought into line with National Socialist objectives. Freisler rose quickly. He entered the Reich Ministry of Justice and, under Minister Franz Gurtner, became one of the ministry officials most eager to recast German criminal law along ideological lines. As State Secretary in the ministry, he promoted measures that expanded the death penalty, redefined treason and sedition, and encouraged courts to treat adherence to National Socialist values as a legal standard. He worked closely with other senior figures in the justice bureaucracy, including Acting Justice Minister Franz Schlegelberger and, later, Otto Thierack, who took over the ministry in 1942. In this period, Freisler was part of the apparatus that translated the regime's racist and political priorities into statutes and decrees that stripped defendants of protections and criminalized wide swaths of behavior deemed hostile to the state.

Interface with the Police State
Freisler's approach to law meshed with the methods of the police and security services. The Gestapo and SS, overseen by Heinrich Himmler and, for security policy, by Reinhard Heydrich (succeeded after 1942 by Ernst Kaltenbrunner), relied on administrative detention and special courts. Freisler championed legal doctrines that reduced judicial oversight of political policing and curbed defendants' rights, ensuring that formal trials could still produce outcomes aligned with the regime. He participated in high-level coordination between ministries; notably, he attended the Wannsee Conference in January 1942 alongside senior officials such as Heydrich, Wilhelm Stuckart from the Interior Ministry, and Adolf Eichmann, where legal and administrative aspects of anti-Jewish policy were discussed in bureaucratic detail.

President of the People's Court
In August 1942, when Otto Thierack moved from the presidency of the Volksgerichtshof (People's Court) to become Minister of Justice, Freisler was appointed to lead the People's Court. Created in 1934 to handle political offenses, this tribunal had already undermined the independence of the judiciary. Under Freisler, it became a central instrument of terror. He dominated proceedings with aggressive, theatrical conduct: he shouted down defendants, berated defense counsel, and treated trials as public pedagogy designed to humiliate the accused and warn the population. The Chief Reich Prosecutor at the People's Court, Ernst Lautz, worked in tandem with Freisler's senate to secure convictions in line with the expectations of the leadership, including Joseph Goebbels, whose propaganda apparatus circulated accounts that amplified the court's intimidatory effect.

Notorious Trials
Freisler presided over a series of high-profile cases. In 1943 he directed the trials of members of the White Rose student resistance in Munich. Sophie Scholl, Hans Scholl, and Christoph Probst were swiftly condemned and executed after a proceeding marked by Freisler's contemptuous interruptions and a foreordained verdict. Subsequent trials resulted in death sentences for Alexander Schmorell, Willi Graf, and Professor Kurt Huber, among others.

After the failed assassination attempt on Hitler on 20 July 1944, the People's Court became the forum for punishing those implicated in resistance circles. Freisler presided over the trials of senior military and civilian figures, including Field Marshal Erwin von Witzleben, General Friedrich Olbricht, and Peter Yorck von Wartenburg, who were sentenced to death. In later sessions, prominent conservative opponents such as former Leipzig mayor and Reich price commissioner Carl Goerdeler and the diplomat Ulrich von Hassell were condemned. He also handled cases connected to the Kreisau Circle; Helmuth James von Moltke was tried and executed after a People's Court judgment in early 1945. These proceedings were often filmed and reported in a manner intended to display the humiliation of the accused, a practice encouraged within the regime and consistent with Hitler's demand for uncompromising severity.

Methods, Doctrine, and Relationships
Freisler's jurisprudence fused legal formalism with ideological decrees. He advocated the idea that the judge should channel the will of the national community rather than adhere strictly to codified norms, turning elastic concepts like undermining military morale into capital offenses. He aligned himself with Thierack's program to transfer increasing numbers of prisoners to the police for extra-judicial execution, eroding the boundary between the court system and the security apparatus. Within the ministry and the courts, he clashed with remnants of the traditional judiciary who resisted total politicization, while cultivating ties with party and state leaders who valued results. He reported outcomes upward and took cues from figures such as Hitler and Goebbels, who wanted conspicuous, exemplary punishment of opponents during wartime.

Death
On 3 February 1945, during a major air raid on Berlin, Freisler was killed when the People's Court building was struck. He died amid the collapse of the capital's administrative core as Allied bombing intensified and Soviet forces advanced toward the city. A trial was underway or due to resume that day against Fabian von Schlabrendorff, a resistance figure; Freisler's death interrupted the proceeding, and Schlabrendorff ultimately survived the war.

Aftermath and Legacy
With the collapse of the Nazi regime, the People's Court was abolished, and its decisions came to be regarded as instruments of state terror rather than legitimate judgments. Postwar legal reforms in Germany voided its verdicts and recognized the victims of its proceedings as persecuted for political, racial, or religious reasons. Freisler's name has since stood as a symbol of the destruction of judicial independence under dictatorship and of the complicity of legal professionals in systemic injustice. He is widely remembered not as a conventional politician but as a jurist who used his courtroom to enforce the will of a violent state, influencing the shape of Nazi criminal law and embodying the regime's fusion of law and terror.

Our collection contains 2 quotes who is written by Roland, under the main topics: Nature - Savage.