William Law Biography Quotes 20 Report mistakes

Early Life and Education

William Law was born in 1686 at King's Cliffe in Northamptonshire, England. Raised in a milieu of parish religion shaped by the Church of England, he showed early aptitude for study and proceeded to Emmanuel College, Cambridge, a college known for serious theological training. He took his degrees and prepared for clerical life in the established church. The political break that followed the death of Queen Anne altered the course of his career. After the accession of George I, Law refused to take the required oaths to the new Hanoverian monarch, identifying with the High Church nonjurors. This refusal cost him his Cambridge fellowship and any path to preferment, but it established the stance that defined his public character: a rigorous fidelity to conscience, even at marked personal cost.

Nonjuror and Controversialist

Law's position set him within the circle of nonjuring clergy who held to the older Stuart allegiance and a sacramental, high view of the church. He defended that position in the pamphlet wars of the early eighteenth century. During the Bangorian controversy he wrote pointedly against Bishop Benjamin Hoadly, whose claims about church authority and the nature of the kingdom of Christ stirred fierce debate. Law's Three Letters to the Bishop of Bangor answered Hoadly with learned and compact argument, making him known as a clear and forceful prose stylist. In other interventions he opposed the moral philosophy that seemed to reduce virtue to self-interest, directing rejoinders to Bernard Mandeville and his Fable of the Bees. He also argued that the theater encouraged habits destructive of Christian seriousness, an attitude consonant with his vision of devotion as a total way of life.

A Serious Call and Moral Theology

Law's reputation rests chiefly on two books. The first, A Practical Treatise upon Christian Perfection, laid out a program for disciplined holiness rooted in prayer, fasting, and works of mercy. The second, A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life, expanded that program into a searching critique of polite nominal Christianity. It urged readers to sanctify ordinary duties, to give alms beyond custom, to pray with constancy, and to treat vocation, wealth, and reputation as matters to be consecrated. The Serious Call circulated widely and left a distinctive mark on the religious culture of the century. Samuel Johnson later testified that its searching pages had awakened him to the demands of religion. John Wesley and George Whitefield, leaders of the Evangelical revival, were among those stirred by Law's insistence that Christianity must be practiced with integrity in common life. Even readers who disagreed with the nonjuring stance found in his prose a tonic voice that joined clarity of thought to moral urgency.

Tutor and Chaplain

Excluded from the ordinary ladder of clerical advancement, Law earned his living partly through service as a tutor and domestic chaplain. For a time he was attached to the household of the Gibbon family. His intellectual seriousness and personal austerity impressed those around him. Edward Gibbon, later the historian, remembered him as a man of exact virtue and uncommon gravity whose counsel weighed heavily in the home. The association also brought Law into contact with Hester Gibbon, a relative who would later share his charitable commitments. Though the young Edward Gibbon would grow apart from Law's religious outlook, the connection between them illustrates how fully Law engaged the social world of his day despite his lack of office in the church.

Mystical Turn and Later Writings

In midlife Law encountered the writings of the German theosopher Jacob Boehme. He became convinced that Boehme's speculative account of the fall, new birth, and divine life could deepen and correct merely external religion. Law's later books, notably The Spirit of Prayer and The Spirit of Love, translated Boehme's themes into English devotional idiom. He stressed the inner new birth, the sanctifying fire of divine love, and the necessity of humility as the door to true knowledge of God. This turn to mystical theology puzzled some admirers who prized the lucid discipline of the Serious Call, among them readers like Edward Gibbon, who found the new emphasis too visionary. Others, however, saw continuity: the same demand for entire devotion now expressed in the language of inward transformation. John Wesley, who had first been helped by Law's early writings, eventually diverged from the Boehmian currents, yet he continued to honor Law's moral seriousness.

Retirement at King's Cliffe and Works of Charity

Law returned to King's Cliffe for his later years, gathering a small household given to prayer, reading, and practical charity. With companions that included Hester Gibbon, he helped to establish local benefactions: education for poor children, aid for the sick, and relief for widows and orphans. He kept up a wide correspondence, offering counsel to clergy, laity, and seekers who visited or wrote after reading his books. The rhythms of the household displayed the regimen he commended: ordered prayer, study of Scripture, self-denial, and generous giving. Without parish charge or ecclesiastical title, he exercised a kind of pastoral care at a remove, forming consciences through letters, tracts, and conversation.

Style, Influence, and Reputation

Law's prose combined simplicity with an astringent edge. He drew sharp moral contrasts, often by imagining the speech or habits of a casual churchgoer and then exposing the gap between profession and practice. That method, honed in the controversies against Hoadly and Mandeville, animated the Serious Call and helped it endure. His influence crossed party lines. High Churchmen recognized a champion of sacramental devotion and church order; Evangelicals found in him an ally for heart religion and practical holiness; moralists valued his reminder that ethics must answer to revealed ends. Figures as various as Samuel Johnson and John Wesley acknowledged debts to his pages, even when they parted from his later speculative theology. The very diversity of his readers indicates the breadth of his appeal in an age of religious transition.

Final Years and Legacy

Law died at King's Cliffe in 1761. He remained a nonjuror to the end, never reconciled to the oaths that had cost him his fellowship. Yet he also remained a churchman devoted to Scripture, sacraments, and the renewal of ordinary life by grace. His body of work forms a bridge between post-Restoration Anglican piety and the awakenings that reshaped Protestant devotion in the eighteenth century. The early treatises continue to summon readers to steady habits of prayer, self-examination, and mercy; the later ones ask after the inner ground of those habits in the life of God. Through controversies with Benjamin Hoadly, arguments against Bernard Mandeville, and the remembered presence in the Gibbon household, he stands as an English divine of uncommon coherence: the same conscience that relinquished academic preferment for principle animated his call to live wholly unto God. His books have rarely been out of print, and their insistent voice still speaks to questions of wealth, ambition, distraction, and charity that register in every age.