"A billion dollars every week for Iraq, $87 billion for Iraq. We can't get $5 billion for childcare over five years in welfare reform"
About this Quote
The math is the moral argument, and Jim Wallis knows it. By putting “a billion dollars every week” next to “$5 billion for childcare over five years,” he’s not just comparing line items; he’s staging a values test that the listener can do in their head, instantly. The numbers are chosen for friction: war spending arrives in breathless, rolling totals, while childcare is framed as a modest, slow drip. The punchline is that the country can mobilize staggering resources when the cause is bombs and occupation, but suddenly becomes a penny-pincher when the cause is parents trying to work without leaving their kids in precarious care.
The intent is to indict priorities, not accounting. Wallis, a faith-inflected progressive voice in the early 2000s, is speaking into the post-9/11 political climate when the Iraq War’s costs were accelerating and domestic policy was being recast through “welfare reform” austerity. The subtext is sharper: calls for fiscal responsibility are revealed as selective, deployed as discipline for the poor and as permission slips for the powerful. “Welfare reform” isn’t neutral here; it’s coded as a moralizing project that treats childcare like an optional benefit rather than the infrastructure that makes work possible.
Rhetorically, Wallis avoids policy wonkery and goes straight for ethical cognition: if we can afford that, we can afford this. The quote works because it exposes a national habit of describing war as necessity and care as indulgence.
The intent is to indict priorities, not accounting. Wallis, a faith-inflected progressive voice in the early 2000s, is speaking into the post-9/11 political climate when the Iraq War’s costs were accelerating and domestic policy was being recast through “welfare reform” austerity. The subtext is sharper: calls for fiscal responsibility are revealed as selective, deployed as discipline for the poor and as permission slips for the powerful. “Welfare reform” isn’t neutral here; it’s coded as a moralizing project that treats childcare like an optional benefit rather than the infrastructure that makes work possible.
Rhetorically, Wallis avoids policy wonkery and goes straight for ethical cognition: if we can afford that, we can afford this. The quote works because it exposes a national habit of describing war as necessity and care as indulgence.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List

