"A confidence problem exists on the part of the people of the region who desire democratic rule in principle, but remain suspicious of both the fashion with which democratization is presented and the purposes of the democratic world"
About this Quote
Democracy, here, is framed less as a destination than as a sales pitch that people are right to distrust. Erdogan’s phrasing turns a potentially damning reality - skepticism toward “the democratic world” - into a rational “confidence problem,” a technical-sounding deficit that just happens to be produced by outsiders’ tone (“the fashion”) and motives (“the purposes”). It’s a neat inversion: the region’s public isn’t anti-democratic; it’s anti-democratization-as-performed.
The word choice does heavy political work. “Desire democratic rule in principle” flatters local aspirations while quietly conceding that, in practice, democratic reforms stall. The culprit is not domestic power structures or repression but the optics and intent of external actors. “Fashion” is especially cutting: democratization becomes a trend, an exportable aesthetic packaged by Western capitals, NGOs, and interventions. If it’s delivered like branding, Erdogan suggests, people will treat it like branding - suspiciously.
Context matters. Coming from a Turkish leader whose own democratic credentials have been repeatedly contested, the statement doubles as a shield. It aligns Erdogan with democratic ideals while legitimizing resistance to foreign pressure and scrutiny. It also folds regional trauma - Iraq, Afghanistan, and the long aftertaste of colonialism - into a single emotional argument: distrust is earned.
The subtext is a bid for sovereignty and narrative control. If “democratization” is tainted by others’ “purposes,” then Turkey (and leaders like Erdogan) can position themselves as the authentic brokers of political change, on their timetable, with fewer lectures - and fewer constraints.
The word choice does heavy political work. “Desire democratic rule in principle” flatters local aspirations while quietly conceding that, in practice, democratic reforms stall. The culprit is not domestic power structures or repression but the optics and intent of external actors. “Fashion” is especially cutting: democratization becomes a trend, an exportable aesthetic packaged by Western capitals, NGOs, and interventions. If it’s delivered like branding, Erdogan suggests, people will treat it like branding - suspiciously.
Context matters. Coming from a Turkish leader whose own democratic credentials have been repeatedly contested, the statement doubles as a shield. It aligns Erdogan with democratic ideals while legitimizing resistance to foreign pressure and scrutiny. It also folds regional trauma - Iraq, Afghanistan, and the long aftertaste of colonialism - into a single emotional argument: distrust is earned.
The subtext is a bid for sovereignty and narrative control. If “democratization” is tainted by others’ “purposes,” then Turkey (and leaders like Erdogan) can position themselves as the authentic brokers of political change, on their timetable, with fewer lectures - and fewer constraints.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Recep
Add to List









