"A Congressional Budget Office study estimated that gulf energy infrastructure repair costs will be between $18 billion and $31 billion, just from the damages the hurricane created"
About this Quote
Numbers are doing the moral work here. By invoking the Congressional Budget Office, Mark Foley borrows technocratic authority to turn a hurricane into a ledger entry: not grief, not displacement, not environmental risk, but a bounded price tag. The sentence is engineered to sound sober and responsible, the way Washington likes its catastrophes - legible, “estimated,” and safely mediated through an institution whose credibility is meant to end argument.
The specific intent is agenda-setting. Foley narrows the frame to “gulf energy infrastructure,” a phrase that quietly centers industry continuity as the urgent problem to solve. “Repair costs” implies an inevitable, practical response: spend, rebuild, restore. It also smuggles in a hierarchy of concern. The hurricane’s damage becomes most politically actionable when it threatens energy networks, revenue, and national supply. People are absent; corporations are implied.
Subtext: this is a pitch for prioritization and, likely, for federal intervention that can be defended as economic necessity rather than compassion. The $18 to $31 billion range performs a familiar rhetorical trick: big enough to demand attention, elastic enough to accommodate future spending without calling it a blank check. “Just from the damages the hurricane created” anticipates skepticism about inflated claims, but it also absolves human decisions - zoning, wetland loss, regulatory capture - that can amplify disaster.
Context matters: post-storm politics often becomes a battle over whose losses count as public business. Foley’s line stakes that claim early, translating chaos into an appropriations-friendly narrative where energy infrastructure is the protagonist.
The specific intent is agenda-setting. Foley narrows the frame to “gulf energy infrastructure,” a phrase that quietly centers industry continuity as the urgent problem to solve. “Repair costs” implies an inevitable, practical response: spend, rebuild, restore. It also smuggles in a hierarchy of concern. The hurricane’s damage becomes most politically actionable when it threatens energy networks, revenue, and national supply. People are absent; corporations are implied.
Subtext: this is a pitch for prioritization and, likely, for federal intervention that can be defended as economic necessity rather than compassion. The $18 to $31 billion range performs a familiar rhetorical trick: big enough to demand attention, elastic enough to accommodate future spending without calling it a blank check. “Just from the damages the hurricane created” anticipates skepticism about inflated claims, but it also absolves human decisions - zoning, wetland loss, regulatory capture - that can amplify disaster.
Context matters: post-storm politics often becomes a battle over whose losses count as public business. Foley’s line stakes that claim early, translating chaos into an appropriations-friendly narrative where energy infrastructure is the protagonist.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List

