"A disk unbeknownst to the director can go to the producer in another city or in another office and that producer can edit behind the director's back much easier than in the old days. Since these dailies are now put on videotape, more kinds of people have access to dailies"
About this Quote
Frankenheimer is basically diagnosing a quiet coup: when images become portable, authority becomes negotiable. He is not waxing nostalgic about celluloid; he is describing a power shift in the production chain. The “disk unbeknownst to the director” is a tiny object carrying an outsized threat: it severs the director’s privileged access to the raw material of the film, the intimate space where intent is still fluid and mistakes can be protected while they’re being solved.
The line works because it’s procedural and paranoid at once. “Another city or in another office” makes the betrayal banal, bureaucratic. No smoky backroom deal is needed; the infrastructure does the scheming for you. Frankenheimer’s emphasis on “behind the director’s back” isn’t just about ego. It’s about authorship and accountability: if decisions migrate to people who weren’t on set, the film can drift from the logic of the shoot, from performance nuances, from the lived context of the day.
The context is the late-20th-century transition from film dailies to video dailies, a technological convenience that doubled as managerial leverage. When dailies are “now put on videotape,” access expands beyond the director, DP, and editor into a wider ecosystem of producers, executives, and stakeholders who can cherry-pick takes, second-guess coverage, and start cutting a version of the movie optimized for risk management rather than vision.
Subtext: democratization isn’t always liberation. Sometimes it’s surveillance with better formatting.
The line works because it’s procedural and paranoid at once. “Another city or in another office” makes the betrayal banal, bureaucratic. No smoky backroom deal is needed; the infrastructure does the scheming for you. Frankenheimer’s emphasis on “behind the director’s back” isn’t just about ego. It’s about authorship and accountability: if decisions migrate to people who weren’t on set, the film can drift from the logic of the shoot, from performance nuances, from the lived context of the day.
The context is the late-20th-century transition from film dailies to video dailies, a technological convenience that doubled as managerial leverage. When dailies are “now put on videotape,” access expands beyond the director, DP, and editor into a wider ecosystem of producers, executives, and stakeholders who can cherry-pick takes, second-guess coverage, and start cutting a version of the movie optimized for risk management rather than vision.
Subtext: democratization isn’t always liberation. Sometimes it’s surveillance with better formatting.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List

