"A doctrine of class war seemed to provide a solution to the problem of poverty to people who know nothing about how wealth is created"
About this Quote
Kirkpatrick’s line is a cold-water splash on a certain kind of political romance: the idea that naming an enemy class can substitute for understanding an economy. The sentence is built like a trap. “Seemed to provide a solution” grants just enough plausibility to hook the listener, then withdraws it with a sharp qualification: this is a solution only “to people who know nothing.” The insult isn’t ornamental; it’s the point. She’s not merely disputing Marxist economics, she’s delegitimizing the moral confidence that often comes packaged with it.
The subtext is classic late-Cold War liberal anti-communism with a neocon edge. “Doctrine” casts class war as theology, not analysis. “Seemed” frames it as an optical illusion. “How wealth is created” shifts the debate from redistribution to production, implying that anti-poverty politics divorced from incentives, investment, and enterprise will end up shrinking the pie and congratulating itself anyway. It’s also a warning about the seduction of blame: class war offers clarity, villains, and a narrative arc; markets offer complexity, tradeoffs, and frustration.
Context matters because Kirkpatrick wasn’t writing as a detached economist; she was a diplomat and power realist in an era when “class struggle” was not just rhetoric but a geopolitical brand used to justify revolutions and regimes. The intent is to discredit that brand at the level of common sense: if you don’t understand creation, you’ll choose destruction and call it justice.
The subtext is classic late-Cold War liberal anti-communism with a neocon edge. “Doctrine” casts class war as theology, not analysis. “Seemed” frames it as an optical illusion. “How wealth is created” shifts the debate from redistribution to production, implying that anti-poverty politics divorced from incentives, investment, and enterprise will end up shrinking the pie and congratulating itself anyway. It’s also a warning about the seduction of blame: class war offers clarity, villains, and a narrative arc; markets offer complexity, tradeoffs, and frustration.
Context matters because Kirkpatrick wasn’t writing as a detached economist; she was a diplomat and power realist in an era when “class struggle” was not just rhetoric but a geopolitical brand used to justify revolutions and regimes. The intent is to discredit that brand at the level of common sense: if you don’t understand creation, you’ll choose destruction and call it justice.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jeane
Add to List








