"A final proof of our ideas can only be obtained by detailed studies on the alterations produced in the amino acid sequence of a protein by mutations of the type discussed here"
About this Quote
Crick is doing something deceptively bold here: staking a grand claim about life while pretending to be modest about it. The line reads like a procedural note, but it’s really a manifesto for a new kind of biological certainty. “Final proof” is the provocation. In science, finality is rare, almost impolite; Crick deploys it anyway, then immediately tethers it to “detailed studies,” the lab-bench grind that keeps the ambition from sounding like metaphysics.
The context is the early age of molecular biology, when DNA had just been crowned the master text and the central dogma was taking shape. The “mutations of the type discussed here” points to a very specific puzzle: how changes in nucleic acids translate into changes in proteins, and whether that translation follows rules. Crick is angling for a decisive bridge between genotype and phenotype, not through speculation but through the forensic comparison of amino acid sequences. Today that sounds routine; at the time it was a dare, because sequencing proteins was painstaking and incomplete, and the mapping from gene to protein still had to be proven rather than assumed.
The subtext is a subtle power move: Crick positions biology as an information science. If you can show, mutation by mutation, that altered genetic “letters” yield altered protein “words,” you don’t just validate a hypothesis; you convert heredity into a legible code. The sentence also reveals his rhetorical style: austere, slightly legalistic, confident that the future will supply the methods to cash his intellectual check.
The context is the early age of molecular biology, when DNA had just been crowned the master text and the central dogma was taking shape. The “mutations of the type discussed here” points to a very specific puzzle: how changes in nucleic acids translate into changes in proteins, and whether that translation follows rules. Crick is angling for a decisive bridge between genotype and phenotype, not through speculation but through the forensic comparison of amino acid sequences. Today that sounds routine; at the time it was a dare, because sequencing proteins was painstaking and incomplete, and the mapping from gene to protein still had to be proven rather than assumed.
The subtext is a subtle power move: Crick positions biology as an information science. If you can show, mutation by mutation, that altered genetic “letters” yield altered protein “words,” you don’t just validate a hypothesis; you convert heredity into a legible code. The sentence also reveals his rhetorical style: austere, slightly legalistic, confident that the future will supply the methods to cash his intellectual check.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Francis
Add to List