"A full and fair discussion is essential to democracy"
About this Quote
Democracy, Soros implies, doesn’t die first at the ballot box; it dies in the conversation. “A full and fair discussion” sounds pleasantly procedural, but the line is really a warning about power: whoever gets to set the terms of debate gets to set the limits of what a society can imagine, fear, or demand. The phrase “full and fair” is doing double-duty. “Full” points to breadth - multiple viewpoints, real information, the messy complexity that propaganda and polarization try to prune away. “Fair” points to process - equal access, good-faith argument, and rules that prevent the loudest money or the most viral outrage from becoming the de facto constitution.
Coming from Soros, a businessman-philanthropist who has been cast simultaneously as democracy’s patron and its alleged puppet master, the sentence also functions as self-justification. He’s arguing that the legitimacy of an open society isn’t just elections; it’s the infrastructure that makes elections meaningful: independent media, protected dissent, and civic institutions that can absorb disagreement without turning it into civil war.
The subtext is defensive and ambitious: defensive against authoritarian tactics that label critique as disloyalty, ambitious because it treats deliberation as a public good worth financing and protecting. In an era when “debate” is routinely gamed - by disinformation, algorithmic rage, and captured outlets - Soros is staking a claim that democracy is less a finished system than a continual argument, and that the argument must be protected from sabotage.
Coming from Soros, a businessman-philanthropist who has been cast simultaneously as democracy’s patron and its alleged puppet master, the sentence also functions as self-justification. He’s arguing that the legitimacy of an open society isn’t just elections; it’s the infrastructure that makes elections meaningful: independent media, protected dissent, and civic institutions that can absorb disagreement without turning it into civil war.
The subtext is defensive and ambitious: defensive against authoritarian tactics that label critique as disloyalty, ambitious because it treats deliberation as a public good worth financing and protecting. In an era when “debate” is routinely gamed - by disinformation, algorithmic rage, and captured outlets - Soros is staking a claim that democracy is less a finished system than a continual argument, and that the argument must be protected from sabotage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List









