"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have"
About this Quote
Ford’s line lands like a tidy warning label on the shiny product of state generosity: if the government can deliver your wishes on demand, it has already amassed the machinery to seize your life on demand. The genius is the symmetry. “Big enough” does the heavy lifting, recasting “help” as “scale,” and scale as danger. He’s not arguing against a specific welfare program so much as against the administrative appetite that grows with each promise. The sentence turns political desire into a trap: wants become a lever, and the lever eventually moves your property, your autonomy, your choices.
The subtext is a lesson in power, not policy. Ford implies that the same institutions that cut checks, regulate markets, and cushion risk can also surveil, coerce, and confiscate. “Everything you want” flatters the citizen as consumer; “everything you have” snaps back to the citizen as subject. It’s a rhetorical pivot from comfort to vulnerability, making the cost of security feel personal and imminent.
Context matters: Ford inherits a bruised national mood after Vietnam and Watergate, when faith in government competence and virtue was already cracked. Add stagflation, energy shocks, and a growing debate over the post-New Deal state, and the quote reads as an attempt to re-legitimize restraint as prudence. It’s less a libertarian manifesto than a presidential effort to reframe limits as a form of protection: not just from taxes, but from the creep of institutional reach that can outlive good intentions.
The subtext is a lesson in power, not policy. Ford implies that the same institutions that cut checks, regulate markets, and cushion risk can also surveil, coerce, and confiscate. “Everything you want” flatters the citizen as consumer; “everything you have” snaps back to the citizen as subject. It’s a rhetorical pivot from comfort to vulnerability, making the cost of security feel personal and imminent.
Context matters: Ford inherits a bruised national mood after Vietnam and Watergate, when faith in government competence and virtue was already cracked. Add stagflation, energy shocks, and a growing debate over the post-New Deal state, and the quote reads as an attempt to re-legitimize restraint as prudence. It’s less a libertarian manifesto than a presidential effort to reframe limits as a form of protection: not just from taxes, but from the creep of institutional reach that can outlive good intentions.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Gerald
Add to List




