"A lot affects the outcome. It boils down to scheduling and the commitment of the network"
About this Quote
The line works because it sounds like a deflation, but its also a survival strategy. Scheduling is the polite word for power: who gets priority, who waits, who is replaceable. Network commitment is the other half of that equation, an almost parental term that masks cold metrics and internal politics. Stiers frames both as determinative, implying that outcomes are less earned than arranged. That is a subtle critique of an industry that sells meritocracy while running on risk management.
Context matters: Stiers comes from an era when network television could make or break careers, and even prestige projects lived or died by time slots, advertising confidence, and promotion budgets. His understatement reads like professional diplomacy - he doesnt name egos, money, or ratings - but the subtext is clear. When a project falters, the story you hear is creative failure; the story he tells is structural. The outcome is negotiated long before the audience ever gets a vote.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Stiers, David Ogden. (2026, January 15). A lot affects the outcome. It boils down to scheduling and the commitment of the network. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/a-lot-affects-the-outcome-it-boils-down-to-160167/
Chicago Style
Stiers, David Ogden. "A lot affects the outcome. It boils down to scheduling and the commitment of the network." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/a-lot-affects-the-outcome-it-boils-down-to-160167/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"A lot affects the outcome. It boils down to scheduling and the commitment of the network." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/a-lot-affects-the-outcome-it-boils-down-to-160167/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.





