"A lot of guys who have never choked have never been in the position to do so"
About this Quote
The intent is defensive, but not merely self-protective. Watson is also policing who gets to talk. He’s drawing a boundary between participants and spectators, between those who have held a late lead with cameras and history pressing down, and those who judge safely from the bleachers. It’s a neat inversion: failure becomes a sign of access, of having earned the right to be evaluated at all.
The subtext is about risk and visibility. “Choke” is rarely used for private collapse; it’s a word reserved for televised, high-stakes unraveling. Watson implies that the real privilege isn’t immunity from choking, it’s the chance to be in a moment where choking is possible. That flips the moral math of sports discourse, which loves clean narratives of mental toughness.
Contextually, it reads like the voice of an elite competitor responding to the cruelty of highlight-reel culture: fans remember the stumble, not the decades of arriving in contention. Watson’s line asks for a more honest scoreboard, one that counts proximity to greatness alongside the cost of reaching for it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Failure |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Watson, Tom. (2026, January 17). A lot of guys who have never choked have never been in the position to do so. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/a-lot-of-guys-who-have-never-choked-have-never-58962/
Chicago Style
Watson, Tom. "A lot of guys who have never choked have never been in the position to do so." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/a-lot-of-guys-who-have-never-choked-have-never-58962/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"A lot of guys who have never choked have never been in the position to do so." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/a-lot-of-guys-who-have-never-choked-have-never-58962/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.






