"A lot of the things that we've been able to do in the last several years were Democratic ideas, including the structure for this new director of national intelligence"
About this Quote
Credit-taking is rarely subtle in Washington, but Harman makes it sound almost bureaucratically inevitable. Her line is built to do two things at once: claim authorship and launder partisanship into “structure.” By saying “a lot of the things that we’ve been able to do” were Democratic ideas, she’s staking out a quiet victory lap without sounding like she’s spiking the football. The phrasing is inclusive - “we’ve been able” - a strategic blur that invites bipartisan buy-in while still labeling the underlying blueprint as Democratic.
The real payload is the example she chooses: “the structure for this new director of national intelligence.” That post was born from the post-9/11 consensus that the intelligence community was too siloed, too competitive, too proud to share. Harman’s reference cues a very specific context: the early-2000s reform wave (9/11 Commission recommendations, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act) when Democrats were eager to be seen as serious about national security, not just civil liberties or anti-war skepticism. She’s rebutting the standard Republican monopoly on toughness by arguing that security architecture itself can be a Democratic innovation.
Subtext: Democrats didn’t just vote for reforms; they supplied the governing concept. And because she stresses “structure,” she’s implying something more durable than policy mood swings - institutions, chain of command, coordination. It’s a politician’s way of saying: this wasn’t improvisation, it was design.
The real payload is the example she chooses: “the structure for this new director of national intelligence.” That post was born from the post-9/11 consensus that the intelligence community was too siloed, too competitive, too proud to share. Harman’s reference cues a very specific context: the early-2000s reform wave (9/11 Commission recommendations, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act) when Democrats were eager to be seen as serious about national security, not just civil liberties or anti-war skepticism. She’s rebutting the standard Republican monopoly on toughness by arguing that security architecture itself can be a Democratic innovation.
Subtext: Democrats didn’t just vote for reforms; they supplied the governing concept. And because she stresses “structure,” she’s implying something more durable than policy mood swings - institutions, chain of command, coordination. It’s a politician’s way of saying: this wasn’t improvisation, it was design.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jane
Add to List

