"A lot of these industries are having difficulty finding reliable workers with the skills they require"
About this Quote
Under the bland, managerial phrasing, Rubin’s line reads like a grenade lobbed into the polite story America tells itself about work. “Difficulty finding reliable workers” is the language of chambers of commerce and HR departments, not street-level revolt. That mismatch is the point: Rubin is ventriloquizing the establishment to expose its quiet panic when labor stops behaving.
The intent isn’t to sympathize with industry. It’s to force a question: reliable for whom, and at what cost? “Reliable” becomes a moral category disguised as a hiring criterion. It doesn’t just mean punctual. It means compliant, non-questioning, willing to accept low wages, bad schedules, and arbitrary authority. The phrase “skills they require” tightens the vise: if you can’t get a job, the system says it’s your deficiency, not the workplace’s conditions or the economy’s incentives. Rubin’s subtext flips that script. Maybe the “skills” being demanded are increasingly narrow, credentialized, and convenient for employers; maybe the real shortage is dignity.
Context matters. Coming out of the 1960s insurgencies Rubin helped animate, skepticism toward corporate power and bureaucratic language was a core tactic. Even if the line echoes contemporary “skills gap” rhetoric, it sits in that long-running cultural fight over who gets to define merit. Read through Rubin, the sentence becomes less a labor-market observation than an indictment: when industries can’t find “reliable” workers, it may be because workers have stopped accepting the terms of reliability.
The intent isn’t to sympathize with industry. It’s to force a question: reliable for whom, and at what cost? “Reliable” becomes a moral category disguised as a hiring criterion. It doesn’t just mean punctual. It means compliant, non-questioning, willing to accept low wages, bad schedules, and arbitrary authority. The phrase “skills they require” tightens the vise: if you can’t get a job, the system says it’s your deficiency, not the workplace’s conditions or the economy’s incentives. Rubin’s subtext flips that script. Maybe the “skills” being demanded are increasingly narrow, credentialized, and convenient for employers; maybe the real shortage is dignity.
Context matters. Coming out of the 1960s insurgencies Rubin helped animate, skepticism toward corporate power and bureaucratic language was a core tactic. Even if the line echoes contemporary “skills gap” rhetoric, it sits in that long-running cultural fight over who gets to define merit. Read through Rubin, the sentence becomes less a labor-market observation than an indictment: when industries can’t find “reliable” workers, it may be because workers have stopped accepting the terms of reliability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|
More Quotes by Jerry
Add to List

