"A major difficulty is that the answer to the Riddle of the Sphinx is partly a product of the answers that we already have given to the riddle in its various forms"
About this Quote
The Riddle of the Sphinx stands in for the enduring problem of understanding life, mind, and human conduct. The difficulty Gregory Bateson points to is recursive: our solutions do not merely reveal the world; they also restructure the very puzzle we claim to solve. Each explanation installs a frame of reference, and that frame selects what counts as evidence, which behaviors become salient, and which outcomes are thinkable. Over time, those frames accumulate and feed back, so that the next answer is shaped by the sediment of earlier ones.
This is not relativism so much as cybernetic realism. Human systems behave differently when they are known, named, and managed. A diagnosis educates symptoms; a metric redefines performance; an economic theory, once adopted by markets and policymakers, alters the behavior it purports to describe. Observation is theory-laden, but in living systems it is also theory-making: our categories enter the circuits of communication and become part of the ecology of causes.
Bateson, working across anthropology, psychiatry, and systems theory, urged attention to levels of abstraction and to feedback. If the observer is inside the system, then linear causality and final answers are the wrong metaphors. The problem is not simply hard; it is dynamic and path-dependent. Each round of answering closes some doors and opens others, narrowing or widening perception in ways that later appear as necessity.
The practical counsel is epistemic humility and reflexivity. Ask not only whether an explanation is correct, but what it will do once released into the loops of practice. Examine the premises that shape our questions. Seek multiple, nonredundant descriptions so no single frame becomes tyrannical. In an ecology of mind, the highest wisdom is to watch how our answers act, because they will become part of the riddle that future thinkers must solve.
This is not relativism so much as cybernetic realism. Human systems behave differently when they are known, named, and managed. A diagnosis educates symptoms; a metric redefines performance; an economic theory, once adopted by markets and policymakers, alters the behavior it purports to describe. Observation is theory-laden, but in living systems it is also theory-making: our categories enter the circuits of communication and become part of the ecology of causes.
Bateson, working across anthropology, psychiatry, and systems theory, urged attention to levels of abstraction and to feedback. If the observer is inside the system, then linear causality and final answers are the wrong metaphors. The problem is not simply hard; it is dynamic and path-dependent. Each round of answering closes some doors and opens others, narrowing or widening perception in ways that later appear as necessity.
The practical counsel is epistemic humility and reflexivity. Ask not only whether an explanation is correct, but what it will do once released into the loops of practice. Examine the premises that shape our questions. Seek multiple, nonredundant descriptions so no single frame becomes tyrannical. In an ecology of mind, the highest wisdom is to watch how our answers act, because they will become part of the riddle that future thinkers must solve.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Gregory
Add to List
