"A man can do what he wants, but not want what he wants"
About this Quote
Freedom, Schopenhauer is saying, is the glamorous story we tell about ourselves after the fact. You can reach for the glass or refuse it; you can marry, quit, move, repent. Action feels elective. But the wanting underneath it all arrives uninvited, like weather. That’s the sting in his clean, almost throwaway phrasing: the first “wants” flatters the ego with agency; the second “wants” pulls the rug, relocating the real driver of your life to a place you don’t govern.
The line works because it weaponizes a common moral intuition. We routinely judge people as if desire itself were a choice: Why do you crave that? Why can’t you just want better things? Schopenhauer’s subtext is an indictment of that smugness. If your desires are stitched together by temperament, biology, upbringing, and circumstance, then “self-control” is less sovereign command than tactical management of forces you didn’t pick. Responsibility doesn’t vanish, but it gets reframed: you’re accountable for what you do with your desires, not for their existence.
Context matters. Schopenhauer writes in the shadow of Kant’s divide between the world as it appears and the world as it is, and against the optimistic, progress-drunk rationalism of his era. He replaces the Enlightenment’s confident “reason” with “the will”: a blind, incessant striving that uses intellect as its press secretary. The quote’s austerity is the point. It’s a philosophical one-liner that feels like a verdict, and it anticipates modern discomforting insights from Freud to neuroscience: the conscious self may be a narrator, not the author.
The line works because it weaponizes a common moral intuition. We routinely judge people as if desire itself were a choice: Why do you crave that? Why can’t you just want better things? Schopenhauer’s subtext is an indictment of that smugness. If your desires are stitched together by temperament, biology, upbringing, and circumstance, then “self-control” is less sovereign command than tactical management of forces you didn’t pick. Responsibility doesn’t vanish, but it gets reframed: you’re accountable for what you do with your desires, not for their existence.
Context matters. Schopenhauer writes in the shadow of Kant’s divide between the world as it appears and the world as it is, and against the optimistic, progress-drunk rationalism of his era. He replaces the Enlightenment’s confident “reason” with “the will”: a blind, incessant striving that uses intellect as its press secretary. The quote’s austerity is the point. It’s a philosophical one-liner that feels like a verdict, and it anticipates modern discomforting insights from Freud to neuroscience: the conscious self may be a narrator, not the author.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|---|
| Source | Rejected source: The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; On Human Nature (Schopenhauer, Arthur, 1860)EBook #10739
Evidence: ed a man who can do what he wants to do shows that he can also do it if what he Other candidates (2) The Philosophy of Film Noir (Mark T. Conard, 2005) compilation95.0% ... Arthur Schopenhauer, “Psychological Observations,” chap. 5 of Studies in Pessimism, trans. T. Bailey Saunders ...... Arthur Schopenhauer (Arthur Schopenhauer) compilation84.6% uers words man can indeed do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants acco |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List






