"A man is never the same for long. He is continually changing. He seldom remains the same even for half an hour"
About this Quote
Stability, Gurdjieff implies, is the story we tell ourselves to avoid noticing how little of us is actually in charge. The line lands because it sounds like common sense - of course people change - then tightens the screws: not over years, not even over a day, but within half an hour. That compressed timescale is the point. It forces the reader to confront the humiliating possibility that what we call a "self" is mostly a rotating cast of moods, impulses, and borrowed attitudes, each grabbing the steering wheel for a few minutes and swearing it has always been there.
Gurdjieff's intent isn't to celebrate fluid identity in a modern, self-expressive way. It's diagnostic, even accusatory. In his system, ordinary consciousness is mechanical: we react, we imitate, we drift. The subtext is that continuity is not a given; it is an achievement. If you cannot remain "the same", it's not because you're beautifully evolving, but because you're asleep - fragmented, suggestible, run by habit and stimulus.
Context matters: Gurdjieff taught in an era enamored with rational mastery and coherent personal narratives, from bourgeois self-improvement to early psychology. He counters with a harsher claim: the everyday person doesn't possess a unified "I" at all. The rhetoric is plain, almost clinical, which is why it bites. No metaphysics, no poetry - just a blunt observation that turns introspection into an ethical demand: if you're changing every half hour, who, exactly, is responsible for your life?
Gurdjieff's intent isn't to celebrate fluid identity in a modern, self-expressive way. It's diagnostic, even accusatory. In his system, ordinary consciousness is mechanical: we react, we imitate, we drift. The subtext is that continuity is not a given; it is an achievement. If you cannot remain "the same", it's not because you're beautifully evolving, but because you're asleep - fragmented, suggestible, run by habit and stimulus.
Context matters: Gurdjieff taught in an era enamored with rational mastery and coherent personal narratives, from bourgeois self-improvement to early psychology. He counters with a harsher claim: the everyday person doesn't possess a unified "I" at all. The rhetoric is plain, almost clinical, which is why it bites. No metaphysics, no poetry - just a blunt observation that turns introspection into an ethical demand: if you're changing every half hour, who, exactly, is responsible for your life?
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List
