"A novelist should not be too intelligent either, although... he may be permitted to be an intellectual"
About this Quote
Burgess is needling the sacred cow of literary seriousness: the idea that the “best” novelist must be the smartest person in the room. By drawing a line between “too intelligent” and “an intellectual,” he smuggles in a mischievous distinction. Intelligence, in this framing, is the impatient, optimizing kind: the brain that wants to solve the book like an equation, to tidy up ambiguity, to dominate characters rather than let them surprise you. The result is fiction that feels like a lecture with dialogue tags.
“Intellectual,” though, is almost a permission slip for curiosity and range. An intellectual can live among ideas without forcing them into a single correct answer; he can make arguments by staging them, letting competing voices clash in the messy arena of plot, desire, and accident. Burgess’s own work makes the case. A Clockwork Orange isn’t impressive because it’s “clever”; it’s disturbing because its linguistic invention, moral inquiry, and brutal comedy are fused to a story that keeps moving, seducing the reader even as it implicates them.
The subtext is also professional, even defensive. Mid-century British letters loved the binary: either you’re a high-minded thinker or a storyteller. Burgess refuses that trap, but he warns against the vanity of pure brainpower. A novelist, he implies, needs more than IQ: an ear for speech, a taste for human irrationality, and the humility to let art outrun explanation. The ellipsis is doing work too, a sly pause that turns the admonition into a wink.
“Intellectual,” though, is almost a permission slip for curiosity and range. An intellectual can live among ideas without forcing them into a single correct answer; he can make arguments by staging them, letting competing voices clash in the messy arena of plot, desire, and accident. Burgess’s own work makes the case. A Clockwork Orange isn’t impressive because it’s “clever”; it’s disturbing because its linguistic invention, moral inquiry, and brutal comedy are fused to a story that keeps moving, seducing the reader even as it implicates them.
The subtext is also professional, even defensive. Mid-century British letters loved the binary: either you’re a high-minded thinker or a storyteller. Burgess refuses that trap, but he warns against the vanity of pure brainpower. A novelist, he implies, needs more than IQ: an ear for speech, a taste for human irrationality, and the humility to let art outrun explanation. The ellipsis is doing work too, a sly pause that turns the admonition into a wink.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Anthony
Add to List
