"A person must have a certain amount of intelligent ignorance to get anywhere"
About this Quote
Progress rarely comes from knowing too much; it comes from knowing just enough to be dangerous, then refusing to be politely intimidated by the rest. Kettering’s “intelligent ignorance” is a backhanded compliment to the amateur impulse that drives invention: the willingness to step into a problem without the full weight of expert consensus pressing on your throat. “Ignorance” here isn’t laziness. It’s selective unknowing, curated doubt, a deliberate blind spot that keeps you from accepting “that won’t work” as the final word.
The phrase works because it splices two forces we usually treat as opposites. “Intelligent” signals rigor, method, and judgment; “ignorance” signals freedom from orthodoxies. Together they describe the mental posture behind most breakthroughs: you understand enough physics, chemistry, or mechanics to build and test, but you’re not so saturated in the field’s taboos that you stop trying. It’s a subtle jab at credentialed pessimism, the kind that mistakes accumulated cautions for wisdom.
Context matters. Kettering built in the thick of early 20th-century industrial America, where labs were becoming corporate, research was becoming professionalized, and the mythology of the lone tinkerer was colliding with the bureaucracy of “best practices.” His line defends experimentation as a moral stance: permission to be wrong in public, to prototype before you’re ready, to ask naive questions that experts have learned to stop asking. In a culture that rewards certainty, he’s arguing that strategic uncertainty is the real career advantage.
The phrase works because it splices two forces we usually treat as opposites. “Intelligent” signals rigor, method, and judgment; “ignorance” signals freedom from orthodoxies. Together they describe the mental posture behind most breakthroughs: you understand enough physics, chemistry, or mechanics to build and test, but you’re not so saturated in the field’s taboos that you stop trying. It’s a subtle jab at credentialed pessimism, the kind that mistakes accumulated cautions for wisdom.
Context matters. Kettering built in the thick of early 20th-century industrial America, where labs were becoming corporate, research was becoming professionalized, and the mythology of the lone tinkerer was colliding with the bureaucracy of “best practices.” His line defends experimentation as a moral stance: permission to be wrong in public, to prototype before you’re ready, to ask naive questions that experts have learned to stop asking. In a culture that rewards certainty, he’s arguing that strategic uncertainty is the real career advantage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List










