"A philosopher once said, 'Half of good philosophy is good grammar.'"
About this Quote
A. P. Martinich’s line lands like a dry correction in the margins of a paper: the grandest ideas still have to pass through sentences. By attributing it to “a philosopher once said,” he gives it the feel of a maxim in the tradition of academic folklore, the kind of remark that circulates in seminars because it’s both slightly funny and slightly threatening. The joke is the reduction: philosophy, that supposedly towering pursuit, is cut down to punctuation and syntax. The threat is that he’s not entirely kidding.
The intent isn’t to glorify pedantry for its own sake; it’s to assert that clarity is not decorative, it’s constitutive. Philosophical arguments live and die on distinctions: scope, reference, implication, quantifiers, negation. Bad grammar doesn’t merely make a claim ugly; it can quietly change what the claim is. In that sense, “good grammar” is a stand-in for logical form, disciplined wording, and the refusal to let ambiguity do the argumentative work.
The subtext is a critique of two common temptations: the mystique of obscurity (if it’s hard to read, it must be deep) and the fantasy that ideas exist untouched by their expression. Martinich, known for work in analytic philosophy and philosophy of language, is speaking from a context where meaning is treated as something you can and should audit. The line draws a boundary around the craft: if you can’t write the thought cleanly, you probably haven’t thought it cleanly.
The intent isn’t to glorify pedantry for its own sake; it’s to assert that clarity is not decorative, it’s constitutive. Philosophical arguments live and die on distinctions: scope, reference, implication, quantifiers, negation. Bad grammar doesn’t merely make a claim ugly; it can quietly change what the claim is. In that sense, “good grammar” is a stand-in for logical form, disciplined wording, and the refusal to let ambiguity do the argumentative work.
The subtext is a critique of two common temptations: the mystique of obscurity (if it’s hard to read, it must be deep) and the fantasy that ideas exist untouched by their expression. Martinich, known for work in analytic philosophy and philosophy of language, is speaking from a context where meaning is treated as something you can and should audit. The line draws a boundary around the craft: if you can’t write the thought cleanly, you probably haven’t thought it cleanly.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by P. Martinich
Add to List




