"A poem is learned by heart and then not again repeated. We will suppose that after a half year it has been forgotten: no effort of recollection is able to call it back again into consciousness"
About this Quote
Ebbinghaus is staging a small tragedy of the mind: the intimate labor of learning “by heart” undone by time’s indifferent weather. The setup is deliberately clean, almost clinical, and that’s the point. He asks us to “suppose” a poem is memorized, then left alone, then lost so thoroughly that “no effort of recollection” can retrieve it. It reads like a thought experiment, but the subtext is an argument against our flattering folk theories of memory - the idea that what once mattered can always be summoned if we just concentrate hard enough.
The poem matters here because it’s a culturally loaded object: memorization implies devotion, education, even identity. If even a poem can vanish, then memory is not a moral achievement or a stable archive; it’s a process with failure modes. Ebbinghaus is stripping away romance to isolate a mechanism. “Into consciousness” is doing heavy work: forgetting isn’t merely losing a file, it’s being cut off from the felt present. The line implies a border between what exists somewhere in the system and what can be made experiential, reportable, alive.
Context sharpens the intent. Ebbinghaus helped build experimental psychology by quantifying learning and forgetting, showing that memory decays in patterned ways unless reinforced. This quote gestures toward that project: treat forgetting as observable, predictable, and ordinary, not as personal weakness. The coldness of “no effort” is almost polemical - a warning that willpower can’t bulldoze biology, and that what we call “remembering” depends on cues, repetition, and timing, not sincerity.
The poem matters here because it’s a culturally loaded object: memorization implies devotion, education, even identity. If even a poem can vanish, then memory is not a moral achievement or a stable archive; it’s a process with failure modes. Ebbinghaus is stripping away romance to isolate a mechanism. “Into consciousness” is doing heavy work: forgetting isn’t merely losing a file, it’s being cut off from the felt present. The line implies a border between what exists somewhere in the system and what can be made experiential, reportable, alive.
Context sharpens the intent. Ebbinghaus helped build experimental psychology by quantifying learning and forgetting, showing that memory decays in patterned ways unless reinforced. This quote gestures toward that project: treat forgetting as observable, predictable, and ordinary, not as personal weakness. The coldness of “no effort” is almost polemical - a warning that willpower can’t bulldoze biology, and that what we call “remembering” depends on cues, repetition, and timing, not sincerity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Hermann
Add to List


