"A poet or prose narrator usually looks back on what he has achieved against a backdrop of the years that have passed, generally finding that some of these achievements are acceptable, while others are less so"
About this Quote
Johnson frames the writer’s life not as a steady ascent but as an awkward inventory taken under unforgiving light. The sentence is almost deliberately plain, yet it smuggles in a quiet provocation: artistry isn’t judged in the moment of making, but in the long, bruising afterlife of memory. “Against a backdrop of the years” turns time into stage scenery, implying that what matters isn’t just what you wrote, but what time makes of you - how events, politics, aging, and shifting taste repaint the same work.
The subtext is a refusal of the romantic myth that writers either “arrive” or “fail.” Johnson’s narrator is neither triumphant nor self-lacerating; he’s auditing. “Acceptable” is the key tell. It’s not “great” or “true” or “beautiful,” but a modest, almost bureaucratic standard - the kind you reach for when certainty has been burned out by experience. That restraint suggests a Scandinavian moral temperament: skepticism about grand self-mythologies, suspicion of easy self-congratulation.
Context matters. Johnson lived through the ideological furnace of the 20th century, when literature wasn’t just aesthetic play but a contested civic instrument. Looking back, a writer might find earlier work “less so” not because it’s technically weak, but because it feels ethically compromised, politically naive, or simply outpaced by history’s violence. The line works because it treats revision of the self as normal: time doesn’t merely judge the work; it rewrites the author.
The subtext is a refusal of the romantic myth that writers either “arrive” or “fail.” Johnson’s narrator is neither triumphant nor self-lacerating; he’s auditing. “Acceptable” is the key tell. It’s not “great” or “true” or “beautiful,” but a modest, almost bureaucratic standard - the kind you reach for when certainty has been burned out by experience. That restraint suggests a Scandinavian moral temperament: skepticism about grand self-mythologies, suspicion of easy self-congratulation.
Context matters. Johnson lived through the ideological furnace of the 20th century, when literature wasn’t just aesthetic play but a contested civic instrument. Looking back, a writer might find earlier work “less so” not because it’s technically weak, but because it feels ethically compromised, politically naive, or simply outpaced by history’s violence. The line works because it treats revision of the self as normal: time doesn’t merely judge the work; it rewrites the author.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|
More Quotes by Eyvind
Add to List
