"A protracted legislative fight will not move us closer to where the music industry wants to be - delivering music to fans through a variety of different, innovative Web sites"
About this Quote
“A protracted legislative fight” is corporate-speak with a velvet glove over a clenched fist. Hilary Rosen, speaking from the business end of the music industry, frames lawmaking as an annoying detour from the real mission: getting songs to fans “through a variety of different, innovative Web sites.” The line is less kumbaya than chess move. By praising “innovation” and “variety,” she borrows the moral prestige of the early web era - openness, speed, consumer choice - and wraps the industry’s preferred outcome inside it.
The intent is to reposition a conflict about control (copyright, licensing, enforcement, revenue splits) as a conflict about momentum. If the fight drags on, the argument goes, everyone loses time and fans lose access. That’s a savvy reframing: it nudges policymakers to see legislation not as protection or reform, but as friction. The industry gets to occupy the “future-facing” posture without conceding the underlying question of who sets the terms of that future.
The subtext: don’t legislate at us; negotiate with us. Rosen’s “where the music industry wants to be” is the tell. Fans appear as the rhetorical beneficiary, but the destination is explicitly industry-defined. “Innovative Web sites” functions as a flexible placeholder - it could mean legit new distribution partners, tightly licensed platforms, or a curated ecosystem where disruption is welcome only after it signs the contract.
Context matters. This comes from a moment when digital distribution was exploding faster than the law could keep up, and the industry was trying to trade its image as a gatekeeper for an image as an enabler - without surrendering the gate.
The intent is to reposition a conflict about control (copyright, licensing, enforcement, revenue splits) as a conflict about momentum. If the fight drags on, the argument goes, everyone loses time and fans lose access. That’s a savvy reframing: it nudges policymakers to see legislation not as protection or reform, but as friction. The industry gets to occupy the “future-facing” posture without conceding the underlying question of who sets the terms of that future.
The subtext: don’t legislate at us; negotiate with us. Rosen’s “where the music industry wants to be” is the tell. Fans appear as the rhetorical beneficiary, but the destination is explicitly industry-defined. “Innovative Web sites” functions as a flexible placeholder - it could mean legit new distribution partners, tightly licensed platforms, or a curated ecosystem where disruption is welcome only after it signs the contract.
Context matters. This comes from a moment when digital distribution was exploding faster than the law could keep up, and the industry was trying to trade its image as a gatekeeper for an image as an enabler - without surrendering the gate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Hilary
Add to List





