"A salute from this corner to President Bush for saying he was willing to investigate raising or eliminating the cap on salaries subject to the Social Security tax"
About this Quote
A salute from this corner lands like a small-town editorial wink: half praise, half pressure. Nick Clooney frames his approval as modest and local, but the gesture is strategic. By applauding Bush not for acting, but for being "willing to investigate", Clooney spotlights how low the bar has been set in Washington on Social Security. The compliment is a leash. It invites follow-through while quietly suggesting that anything less would be cowardice.
The target is the payroll tax cap, the policy quirk that makes Social Security feel broadly shared for most workers and oddly optional for high earners once they cross the threshold. Clooney's phrasing - "raising or eliminating" - does important work: it normalizes what opponents brand as radical. He doesn't lead with class warfare; he leads with housekeeping. If Social Security is a shared obligation, why should it stop being shared right when the paychecks get biggest?
The context is a period when Social Security debates were dominated by austerity framing: benefit trims, privatization flirtations, the familiar warning that the program is doomed unless ordinary people accept less. Clooney flips the script by pointing upward, not downward. Even if Bush was never likely to embrace a full cap repeal, acknowledging it as discussable cracks the rhetorical ceiling. Clooney seizes that crack, turning a tentative political signal into a public expectation: if you're serious about solvency, start with the part of the system that already looks like an exception written for the comfortable.
The target is the payroll tax cap, the policy quirk that makes Social Security feel broadly shared for most workers and oddly optional for high earners once they cross the threshold. Clooney's phrasing - "raising or eliminating" - does important work: it normalizes what opponents brand as radical. He doesn't lead with class warfare; he leads with housekeeping. If Social Security is a shared obligation, why should it stop being shared right when the paychecks get biggest?
The context is a period when Social Security debates were dominated by austerity framing: benefit trims, privatization flirtations, the familiar warning that the program is doomed unless ordinary people accept less. Clooney flips the script by pointing upward, not downward. Even if Bush was never likely to embrace a full cap repeal, acknowledging it as discussable cracks the rhetorical ceiling. Clooney seizes that crack, turning a tentative political signal into a public expectation: if you're serious about solvency, start with the part of the system that already looks like an exception written for the comfortable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Nick
Add to List
