"A severe though not unfriendly critic of our institutions said that the cure for admiring the House of Lords was to go and look at it"
About this Quote
Bagehot lands the punch with a genteel smile: the “cure” for admiring the House of Lords is simple exposure therapy. It’s a Victorian put-down disguised as a compliment to fairness. He grants the critic is “severe though not unfriendly,” a phrase that functions like a silk glove over brass knuckles; the real target isn’t one mean commentator, but a whole culture of inherited reverence.
The line works because it flips the usual logic of institutional legitimacy. Admirers treat the Lords as an idea: continuity, tradition, stability, the romance of governance by “the best.” Bagehot insists that the real Lords - the physical chamber, the lived spectacle, the people in it - punctures the spell. Go look. The implication is not that the institution is secretly monstrous, but that it’s visibly unimpressive, maybe even faintly absurd. Awe survives at a distance; proximity turns myth into furniture.
Context matters: Bagehot is writing in a Britain negotiating modern democracy while keeping aristocratic architecture intact. He understood that power isn’t only exercised through laws and votes; it’s maintained through pageantry, deference, and the emotional comfort of ritual. This sentence is a scalpel aimed at that soft power. It suggests the House of Lords depends on being imagined more than inspected.
There’s cynicism here, but also a reformer’s pragmatism: if you want to weaken an institution that survives on prestige, don’t argue abstractions. Let the audience see the mismatch between the grandeur promised and the reality performed.
The line works because it flips the usual logic of institutional legitimacy. Admirers treat the Lords as an idea: continuity, tradition, stability, the romance of governance by “the best.” Bagehot insists that the real Lords - the physical chamber, the lived spectacle, the people in it - punctures the spell. Go look. The implication is not that the institution is secretly monstrous, but that it’s visibly unimpressive, maybe even faintly absurd. Awe survives at a distance; proximity turns myth into furniture.
Context matters: Bagehot is writing in a Britain negotiating modern democracy while keeping aristocratic architecture intact. He understood that power isn’t only exercised through laws and votes; it’s maintained through pageantry, deference, and the emotional comfort of ritual. This sentence is a scalpel aimed at that soft power. It suggests the House of Lords depends on being imagined more than inspected.
There’s cynicism here, but also a reformer’s pragmatism: if you want to weaken an institution that survives on prestige, don’t argue abstractions. Let the audience see the mismatch between the grandeur promised and the reality performed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|---|
| Source | Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution (1867). Public-domain edition contains Bagehot's well-known remark on the House of Lords often quoted as "A severe though not unfriendly critic of our institutions said that the cure for admiring the House of Lords was to go and look at it." |
More Quotes by Walter
Add to List







