"A skilled Transition Team leader will set the general goals for a Transition, and then confer on the other team leaders working with him the power to implement those goals"
About this Quote
Power, in Richard V. Allen's formulation, is less about charisma than choreography. The line reads like a procedural memo, but its real subject is legitimacy: a transition only looks competent when authority is deliberately distributed, not hoarded. Allen is describing an architecture of control that avoids the two classic transition failures - leaders who micromanage and stall, and leaders who delegate without a coherent center and drift into factional chaos.
The specific intent is managerial: set "general goals" early, then make delegation explicit. That word "confer" is doing heavy lifting. It implies a formal transfer of mandate, not a casual "go handle it". In a transition, where no one fully owns the machinery yet and everyone is auditioning for influence, ambiguity breeds turf wars. Allen is prescribing clarity as a political tool. You empower sub-leaders not just to get tasks done, but to create a chain of accountability that can survive media scrutiny and internal rivalries.
The subtext is also a quiet warning about ego. A transition leader who clings to implementation is signaling distrust, and distrust metastasizes fast in a temporary government-in-waiting. By contrast, a leader who defines goals and then steps back communicates confidence and builds buy-in. It's management advice with a Cold War-era edge: in high-stakes, high-visibility moments, command is less about issuing orders than ensuring the system can act quickly without constantly seeking permission.
The specific intent is managerial: set "general goals" early, then make delegation explicit. That word "confer" is doing heavy lifting. It implies a formal transfer of mandate, not a casual "go handle it". In a transition, where no one fully owns the machinery yet and everyone is auditioning for influence, ambiguity breeds turf wars. Allen is prescribing clarity as a political tool. You empower sub-leaders not just to get tasks done, but to create a chain of accountability that can survive media scrutiny and internal rivalries.
The subtext is also a quiet warning about ego. A transition leader who clings to implementation is signaling distrust, and distrust metastasizes fast in a temporary government-in-waiting. By contrast, a leader who defines goals and then steps back communicates confidence and builds buy-in. It's management advice with a Cold War-era edge: in high-stakes, high-visibility moments, command is less about issuing orders than ensuring the system can act quickly without constantly seeking permission.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List





