"A small error in the former will produce an enormous error in the latter"
About this Quote
Poincare is warning you that the world is booby-trapped against tidy prediction. The line has the clean, almost bureaucratic chill of a theorem, but its intent is existential: if your starting conditions are even slightly wrong, your final forecast can be wildly, irretrievably wrong. It reads like a technical aside; it lands like a demolition charge under the 19th-century faith in clockwork certainty.
Context matters. Poincare was probing the n-body problem in celestial mechanics, a prestige arena where Newtonian physics was supposed to deliver perfect, priestly foresight. Instead he finds a kind of mathematical profanity: determinism can exist on paper while practical predictability collapses in practice. That gap between “the equations are deterministic” and “the future is knowable” is the subtext doing the heavy lifting. He’s not saying the universe is random; he’s saying our measurements, our rounding, our data collection, our models all introduce tiny inaccuracies that the system itself will amplify.
The phrase “former” and “latter” is doing rhetorical work, too. It abstracts away the particulars to make the point portable: astronomy, weather, economics, epidemics, even personal decisions. The menace is scale. “Small” and “enormous” aren’t just adjectives; they’re a narrative of escalation, a reminder that error grows with time and complexity.
This is early chaos theory in a sentence, but it’s also a critique of technocratic confidence: precision isn’t a moral virtue if the system punishes it with exponential consequences.
Context matters. Poincare was probing the n-body problem in celestial mechanics, a prestige arena where Newtonian physics was supposed to deliver perfect, priestly foresight. Instead he finds a kind of mathematical profanity: determinism can exist on paper while practical predictability collapses in practice. That gap between “the equations are deterministic” and “the future is knowable” is the subtext doing the heavy lifting. He’s not saying the universe is random; he’s saying our measurements, our rounding, our data collection, our models all introduce tiny inaccuracies that the system itself will amplify.
The phrase “former” and “latter” is doing rhetorical work, too. It abstracts away the particulars to make the point portable: astronomy, weather, economics, epidemics, even personal decisions. The menace is scale. “Small” and “enormous” aren’t just adjectives; they’re a narrative of escalation, a reminder that error grows with time and complexity.
This is early chaos theory in a sentence, but it’s also a critique of technocratic confidence: precision isn’t a moral virtue if the system punishes it with exponential consequences.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Henri
Add to List








