"A teacher should have maximal authority, and minimal power"
About this Quote
Szasz’s line is a scalpel aimed at the modern classroom’s favorite confusion: mistaking coercion for legitimacy. “Maximal authority” isn’t about barking orders; it’s about credibility so solid students grant it voluntarily. Authority here is moral and intellectual capital: mastery of the subject, fairness, consistency, the felt sense that the teacher’s guidance makes you more capable rather than more compliant. You can’t mandate that kind of authority. You earn it, and it evaporates the moment it’s treated like entitlement.
“Minimal power” is the sting. Power is the machinery behind the teacher: compulsory attendance, grades that gatekeep futures, disciplinary referrals, administrative escalation. Szasz, famous for challenging psychiatry’s institutional force, is hypersensitive to systems that claim to “help” while quietly holding levers over people. In schools, power often arrives dressed as care or order, but it functions as leverage. The quote warns that once a teacher relies on leverage, the relationship curdles into control-and-resistance. Learning becomes secondary; managing risk becomes the job.
The subtext is also a defense of student autonomy. Real teaching, for Szasz, resembles a contract between adults-in-training: persuasion, example, invitation, rigorous standards made transparent. The context is a late-20th-century world thick with bureaucratized education and therapeutic language, where “for your own good” can justify almost anything. He’s arguing for an ethic: the teacher as a figure students can respect, not an agent empowered to punish them into performance.
“Minimal power” is the sting. Power is the machinery behind the teacher: compulsory attendance, grades that gatekeep futures, disciplinary referrals, administrative escalation. Szasz, famous for challenging psychiatry’s institutional force, is hypersensitive to systems that claim to “help” while quietly holding levers over people. In schools, power often arrives dressed as care or order, but it functions as leverage. The quote warns that once a teacher relies on leverage, the relationship curdles into control-and-resistance. Learning becomes secondary; managing risk becomes the job.
The subtext is also a defense of student autonomy. Real teaching, for Szasz, resembles a contract between adults-in-training: persuasion, example, invitation, rigorous standards made transparent. The context is a late-20th-century world thick with bureaucratized education and therapeutic language, where “for your own good” can justify almost anything. He’s arguing for an ethic: the teacher as a figure students can respect, not an agent empowered to punish them into performance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List






