"A time will come when a politician who has willfully made war and promoted international dissension will be as sure of the dock and much surer of the noose than a private homicide. It is not reasonable that those who gamble with men's lives should not stake their own"
About this Quote
Wells writes like a man watching the 20th century warm up its engines and deciding politeness is the real enemy. The line is a fantasy of moral bookkeeping: if a single murder earns a trial and a rope, then the architect of mass death should face something harsher, not softer. It’s not just outrage; it’s a deliberate inversion of how states normally launder violence into legitimacy. Private homicide is treated as aberration. War-making, when done from a cabinet room, gets framed as duty, strategy, even “history.” Wells refuses the laundering.
The subtext is aimed at the most protected class of his era: decision-makers insulated by distance, bureaucracy, and patriotic rhetoric. “Willfully made war” is the key phrase. He’s not condemning tragedy or miscalculation; he’s targeting intent, the cold choice to “promote international dissension” for power, empire, or domestic advantage. In that world, war is less an emergency than a political instrument. Wells wants to strip it of its aura and rename it as what it resembles: premeditated violence on an industrial scale.
The dock and the noose are rhetorical blunt objects, meant to shock liberal consciences out of their usual exemptions. Wells isn’t naïvely bloodthirsty; he’s trying to make accountability imaginable. Written in the shadow of mechanized slaughter and rising nationalism, it anticipates later arguments behind war-crimes tribunals: that sovereignty shouldn’t function as a get-out-of-jail-free card, and that “gambling with men’s lives” is not statesmanship but a crime with a press office.
The subtext is aimed at the most protected class of his era: decision-makers insulated by distance, bureaucracy, and patriotic rhetoric. “Willfully made war” is the key phrase. He’s not condemning tragedy or miscalculation; he’s targeting intent, the cold choice to “promote international dissension” for power, empire, or domestic advantage. In that world, war is less an emergency than a political instrument. Wells wants to strip it of its aura and rename it as what it resembles: premeditated violence on an industrial scale.
The dock and the noose are rhetorical blunt objects, meant to shock liberal consciences out of their usual exemptions. Wells isn’t naïvely bloodthirsty; he’s trying to make accountability imaginable. Written in the shadow of mechanized slaughter and rising nationalism, it anticipates later arguments behind war-crimes tribunals: that sovereignty shouldn’t function as a get-out-of-jail-free card, and that “gambling with men’s lives” is not statesmanship but a crime with a press office.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Wells
Add to List






