"A win by an unsound combination, however showy, fills me with artistic horror"
About this Quote
Steinitz is dunking on flash before that was even a cultural category. "Artistic horror" is a deliberately fussy phrase for a chess player to use about winning, and thats the point: he treats victory without structural integrity as kitsch. The word "showy" is doing the dirty work here, casting certain wins as stage magic: applause now, embarrassment later, once the trap is seen and the lights come up.
The intent is polemical. Steinitz, the first official world chess champion, helped drag the game from the romantic era of sacrificial fireworks into a more modern, positional logic. In his time, crowd-pleasing combinations were currency; brilliancies made reputations. By calling an "unsound combination" a source of horror even when it succeeds, he flips the incentive system. Hes not just saying "be accurate". Hes arguing that correctness is a kind of ethics: a win should be defensible, not merely fortunate.
The subtext is also autobiographical and status-conscious. Steinitz had to justify a new aesthetic against an older, more glamorous one, and he does it by borrowing the language of high art: soundness as craft, not spectacle. "Fills me" makes it visceral, almost moral nausea, like watching someone cheat and still get celebrated.
Contextually, its a warning that feels eerily contemporary. Substitute "viral" for "showy" and you get the same critique of outcomes that reward distortion: success that cant be repeated, explained, or trusted. Steinitz is insisting that the real flex isnt the win; its the win that survives analysis.
The intent is polemical. Steinitz, the first official world chess champion, helped drag the game from the romantic era of sacrificial fireworks into a more modern, positional logic. In his time, crowd-pleasing combinations were currency; brilliancies made reputations. By calling an "unsound combination" a source of horror even when it succeeds, he flips the incentive system. Hes not just saying "be accurate". Hes arguing that correctness is a kind of ethics: a win should be defensible, not merely fortunate.
The subtext is also autobiographical and status-conscious. Steinitz had to justify a new aesthetic against an older, more glamorous one, and he does it by borrowing the language of high art: soundness as craft, not spectacle. "Fills me" makes it visceral, almost moral nausea, like watching someone cheat and still get celebrated.
Contextually, its a warning that feels eerily contemporary. Substitute "viral" for "showy" and you get the same critique of outcomes that reward distortion: success that cant be repeated, explained, or trusted. Steinitz is insisting that the real flex isnt the win; its the win that survives analysis.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Wilhelm
Add to List






