"A writer should have the precision of a poet and the imagination of a scientist"
About this Quote
Nabokov’s line is a small act of literary contraband: it sneaks “science” back into the temple of art without letting it wear the lab coat. Coming from a novelist obsessed with lepidoptery and sentence-level exactitude, the pairing isn’t a kumbaya merger of “two cultures” so much as a demand that writers stop romanticizing their own vagueness. “Precision” isn’t just clean prose; it’s moral and sensory accuracy, the refusal to settle for the nearest synonym or the easiest emotion. Nabokov’s best scenes feel pinned like specimens: vivid, cruelly detailed, impossible to hand-wave.
Then he spikes the other half of the stereotype. Scientists, in the popular imagination, are method machines; Nabokov insists their core engine is imagination. Hypotheses are stories with consequences, disciplined fictions that must survive reality’s cross-examination. He’s quietly telling writers: borrow that audacity. Invent boldly, but test your inventions against the world’s texture. The sentence should land with the inevitability of proof, even if it’s describing a hallucination.
The subtext is also polemical. Nabokov distrusted the sloppy grandstanding of “ideas” in fiction and the piety of social messaging. This is craft as high standard, not literature as sermon. In mid-century debates about realism, psychology, and ideology, he plants his flag on the micro-level: words, images, structures. If you want to earn a reader’s belief, he suggests, you need both the poet’s calibrated ear and the scientist’s fearless model-building. Anything less is just noise wearing a narrative.
Then he spikes the other half of the stereotype. Scientists, in the popular imagination, are method machines; Nabokov insists their core engine is imagination. Hypotheses are stories with consequences, disciplined fictions that must survive reality’s cross-examination. He’s quietly telling writers: borrow that audacity. Invent boldly, but test your inventions against the world’s texture. The sentence should land with the inevitability of proof, even if it’s describing a hallucination.
The subtext is also polemical. Nabokov distrusted the sloppy grandstanding of “ideas” in fiction and the piety of social messaging. This is craft as high standard, not literature as sermon. In mid-century debates about realism, psychology, and ideology, he plants his flag on the micro-level: words, images, structures. If you want to earn a reader’s belief, he suggests, you need both the poet’s calibrated ear and the scientist’s fearless model-building. Anything less is just noise wearing a narrative.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Vladimir
Add to List
