"About five, six FBI agents walked into the courthouse and arrested me. They said I was being arrested for distribution of information related to explosives over the Internet"
About this Quote
The line lands with the blunt shock of bureaucracy turned theatrical: “About five, six FBI agents” is an inventory of force, not a detail for color. Austin opens by counting bodies because the real message is scale - the state arriving in formation to make an example out of one person. The courthouse setting sharpens that point. A courthouse is supposed to symbolize neutral procedure, yet his arrest happens there like a stage-managed reversal: justice as backdrop for intimidation.
Then comes the charge, rendered in cold, passable legalese: “distribution of information related to explosives over the Internet.” It’s a phrase built to blur lines. Not “making explosives.” Not “planning violence.” Information “related to” explosives is a wide net, and “over the Internet” signals the era when authorities were still treating online speech as both unfamiliar and inherently suspect. The wording weaponizes vagueness; it implies danger without naming an act of harm.
Austin’s specific intent is to reframe his case as a speech issue rather than a public-safety one. He’s not arguing innocence in the narrow sense as much as narrating a power dynamic: a political activist confronted by a national security apparatus eager to conflate radical content with criminal conspiracy. Subtextually, the quote sketches how surveillance culture works best when it looks routine. You don’t need a dramatic accusation if you can make “information” sound like contraband.
Context matters: post-90s anxiety about “cyber” threats and DIY extremism, plus a legal system still deciding whether the Internet is a library, a printing press, or a crime scene. Austin’s sentence exposes the oldest tactic in modern packaging: treat speech as an accelerant, then punish the messenger for the fire you fear might happen.
Then comes the charge, rendered in cold, passable legalese: “distribution of information related to explosives over the Internet.” It’s a phrase built to blur lines. Not “making explosives.” Not “planning violence.” Information “related to” explosives is a wide net, and “over the Internet” signals the era when authorities were still treating online speech as both unfamiliar and inherently suspect. The wording weaponizes vagueness; it implies danger without naming an act of harm.
Austin’s specific intent is to reframe his case as a speech issue rather than a public-safety one. He’s not arguing innocence in the narrow sense as much as narrating a power dynamic: a political activist confronted by a national security apparatus eager to conflate radical content with criminal conspiracy. Subtextually, the quote sketches how surveillance culture works best when it looks routine. You don’t need a dramatic accusation if you can make “information” sound like contraband.
Context matters: post-90s anxiety about “cyber” threats and DIY extremism, plus a legal system still deciding whether the Internet is a library, a printing press, or a crime scene. Austin’s sentence exposes the oldest tactic in modern packaging: treat speech as an accelerant, then punish the messenger for the fire you fear might happen.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Sherman
Add to List


