"Acting is not being emotional, but being able to express emotion"
About this Quote
The subtext is almost prosecutorial: if you equate acting with being emotional, you excuse sloppiness as sincerity. You reward the performer who melts down on cue, and you miss the craft required to make a single raised eyebrow land like a plot twist. Quillen is defending technique - timing, control, physicality, voice - against the cultural temptation to treat intensity as proof of truth. He’s also quietly widening the charge beyond the stage. The same confusion shows up in politics, pulpits, and newsrooms: we trust the person who seems to feel most, not the one who can communicate clearly.
Context matters. Quillen wrote in the early 20th century, when theater was competing with film’s close-ups and the rising cult of personality. Expression became both more scrutinized and more commodified. His sentence functions like a debunking caption under the myth of the suffering artist: emotion is raw material; performance is the finished product. The line works because it refuses sentimentality while still taking feeling seriously - it insists the audience deserves more than your tears. It deserves your control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Quillen, Robert. (2026, January 14). Acting is not being emotional, but being able to express emotion. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/acting-is-not-being-emotional-but-being-able-to-165738/
Chicago Style
Quillen, Robert. "Acting is not being emotional, but being able to express emotion." FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/acting-is-not-being-emotional-but-being-able-to-165738/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Acting is not being emotional, but being able to express emotion." FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/acting-is-not-being-emotional-but-being-able-to-165738/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.








