"Actors need bricks to play with, and in fact we rejected all the improvised fragments we had made without a plan. Improvisation without a plan is like tennis without tennis balls"
About this Quote
Von Trier’s metaphor is a neat act of provocation: he takes the romantic story we like to tell about actors and directors - that the best moments are “found” in free play - and snaps it in half. “Bricks” is the key word. Not inspiration, not vulnerability, not “truth.” Bricks: hard, modular, blunt. He frames acting as construction, not confession. The image flatters performers while disciplining them at the same time: you’re creative, yes, but you’re creative within a designed world.
The subtext is a quiet rejection of auteur-adjacent mysticism about spontaneity. Von Trier, who’s spent a career weaponizing rules (Dogme 95’s puritan constraints, the sadistic game-structure of films like The Five Obstructions), argues that freedom is something you earn through limitation. A plan isn’t a cage; it’s the ball that makes the game legible. Without it, improvisation turns into motion without stakes - energy that can’t accumulate into meaning.
There’s also an anxiety about waste embedded in the line: “we rejected all the improvised fragments.” In von Trier’s universe, fragments are suspect unless they click into an architecture. That’s less about hating improvisation than about distrusting the edit-room alchemy where anything can be justified after the fact. He wants intention up front, so the film’s cruelty or tenderness doesn’t read as accidental.
The tennis comparison lands because it’s so petty and physical: no ball, no sport, just people swinging at air. That’s von Trier in miniature - a practical insult dressed as artistic philosophy.
The subtext is a quiet rejection of auteur-adjacent mysticism about spontaneity. Von Trier, who’s spent a career weaponizing rules (Dogme 95’s puritan constraints, the sadistic game-structure of films like The Five Obstructions), argues that freedom is something you earn through limitation. A plan isn’t a cage; it’s the ball that makes the game legible. Without it, improvisation turns into motion without stakes - energy that can’t accumulate into meaning.
There’s also an anxiety about waste embedded in the line: “we rejected all the improvised fragments.” In von Trier’s universe, fragments are suspect unless they click into an architecture. That’s less about hating improvisation than about distrusting the edit-room alchemy where anything can be justified after the fact. He wants intention up front, so the film’s cruelty or tenderness doesn’t read as accidental.
The tennis comparison lands because it’s so petty and physical: no ball, no sport, just people swinging at air. That’s von Trier in miniature - a practical insult dressed as artistic philosophy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lars
Add to List



