"Adding sound to movies would be like putting lipstick on the Venus de Milo"
About this Quote
The specific intent is conservative in the literal sense: conserve the language of silent cinema, where meaning lives in gesture, rhythm, light, and editing rather than in dialogue. Pickford frames sound not as innovation but as vulgar garnish, a new technology marketed as progress that risks flattening an expressive form into photographed theater.
The subtext is sharper. Sound threatened the hierarchy of stardom. Silent celebrities were built on faces, movement, and carefully managed mystique; microphones and naturalistic speech could expose class, accent, age, even national origin. Pickford’s own “America’s Sweetheart” persona was a precisely calibrated silent fantasy. Talkies demanded reinvention, and reinvention is what industries call you when they want to renegotiate your value.
The context, then, is a moment when aesthetics and economics collided. The industry was pivoting to capture novelty and lock audiences into new exhibition tech. Pickford’s line reads like taste, but it’s also labor politics: an early warning that “progress” often arrives as a makeover that benefits the system more than the artist.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Pickford, Mary. (2026, January 15). Adding sound to movies would be like putting lipstick on the Venus de Milo. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/adding-sound-to-movies-would-be-like-putting-163541/
Chicago Style
Pickford, Mary. "Adding sound to movies would be like putting lipstick on the Venus de Milo." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/adding-sound-to-movies-would-be-like-putting-163541/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Adding sound to movies would be like putting lipstick on the Venus de Milo." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/adding-sound-to-movies-would-be-like-putting-163541/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.




