"Africa is poor because its investors and its creditors are unspeakably rich"
About this Quote
Klein’s line works like a moral boomerang: it takes a familiar story about African poverty and snaps the blame back onto the people who usually get cast as “helpers.” The punch is in the causal inversion. Not “Africa is poor and therefore needs investors,” but “Africa is poor because investors and creditors are rich.” Wealth isn’t presented as a neutral outcome of savvy markets; it’s framed as the downstream reward of an upstream extraction.
The phrase “unspeakably rich” isn’t just emphasis, it’s an accusation. “Unspeakable” suggests that the scale of the wealth is indecent, beyond normal democratic language, the kind of fortune that has to be sanitized into euphemisms like “development,” “risk,” and “aid.” Klein’s subtext is that poverty and wealth are not separate conditions to be managed in parallel; they are linked states produced by the same system. Her target isn’t individual greed so much as the architecture of debt, structural adjustment, commodity dependence, and capital flight that allows money to leave faster than it arrives.
Context matters: Klein writes in the long shadow of 1980s-90s IMF/World Bank policies, privatization drives, and the post-2000 branding of “Africa rising,” where investment narratives often mask who bears the cost of volatility and repayment. The sentence is deliberately blunt because it’s meant to puncture a pious consensus. If investors and creditors are “unspeakably rich,” then the polite story about benevolent capital starts to sound less like economics and more like alibi.
The phrase “unspeakably rich” isn’t just emphasis, it’s an accusation. “Unspeakable” suggests that the scale of the wealth is indecent, beyond normal democratic language, the kind of fortune that has to be sanitized into euphemisms like “development,” “risk,” and “aid.” Klein’s subtext is that poverty and wealth are not separate conditions to be managed in parallel; they are linked states produced by the same system. Her target isn’t individual greed so much as the architecture of debt, structural adjustment, commodity dependence, and capital flight that allows money to leave faster than it arrives.
Context matters: Klein writes in the long shadow of 1980s-90s IMF/World Bank policies, privatization drives, and the post-2000 branding of “Africa rising,” where investment narratives often mask who bears the cost of volatility and repayment. The sentence is deliberately blunt because it’s meant to puncture a pious consensus. If investors and creditors are “unspeakably rich,” then the polite story about benevolent capital starts to sound less like economics and more like alibi.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|
More Quotes by Naomi
Add to List






