"After a lifetime of world travel I've been fascinated that those in the third world don't have the same perception of reality that we do"
About this Quote
The line lands like a confession disguised as anthropology: a well-traveled Western narrator admitting fascination with how "they" perceive reality, while quietly assuming there is a default "we" whose reality is the benchmark. Harrison, the novelist-poet of appetite and dislocation, isn’t simply gawking at difference. He’s exposing how travel can widen your map without shrinking your ego. The sentence’s power is in its blunt, almost unpolished phrasing: it’s the kind of thing people say when they think they’re being open-minded, unaware they’ve smuggled hierarchy into the grammar.
"Third world" does a lot of work here, and not the noble kind. It’s an old Cold War label that turns vast, specific societies into a single category defined by lack. Pair that with "don’t have the same perception of reality", and you get an implication that poverty or political instability produces a distorted worldview, as if material conditions don’t also shape the "we" who get to call their outlook reality in the first place. The subtext: the traveler wants to be changed by what he’s seen, but he’s also protecting his centrality.
Context matters: Harrison came of age in an era when writers were encouraged to treat the globe as a proving ground for insight. Read generously, the quote can be taken as a clumsy acknowledgement that culture isn’t cosmetic; it structures what people notice, fear, expect, and believe. Read less generously, it’s a snapshot of liberal exoticism - curiosity that stops short of questioning the speaker’s own "perception of reality" as local, interested, and contingent. The unease is the point: it reveals the lingering colonial reflex in even sincere wonder.
"Third world" does a lot of work here, and not the noble kind. It’s an old Cold War label that turns vast, specific societies into a single category defined by lack. Pair that with "don’t have the same perception of reality", and you get an implication that poverty or political instability produces a distorted worldview, as if material conditions don’t also shape the "we" who get to call their outlook reality in the first place. The subtext: the traveler wants to be changed by what he’s seen, but he’s also protecting his centrality.
Context matters: Harrison came of age in an era when writers were encouraged to treat the globe as a proving ground for insight. Read generously, the quote can be taken as a clumsy acknowledgement that culture isn’t cosmetic; it structures what people notice, fear, expect, and believe. Read less generously, it’s a snapshot of liberal exoticism - curiosity that stops short of questioning the speaker’s own "perception of reality" as local, interested, and contingent. The unease is the point: it reveals the lingering colonial reflex in even sincere wonder.
Quote Details
| Topic | Travel |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List



