"After all it really is all of humanity that is under threat during a pandemic"
About this Quote
The line lands like a deliberate widening of the camera lens: stop thinking in national case counts, start thinking in species-level stakes. Coming from Margaret Chan, a former director-general of the World Health Organization, the sentence isn’t poetry so much as policy rhetoric with a moral edge. “After all” does quiet, strategic work. It signals impatience with narrower framings - the notion that a pandemic is primarily a problem for “those countries,” “those communities,” or the medically vulnerable. Chan is insisting on a different unit of analysis: humanity as a single, interdependent system.
The phrase “really is” reads like a corrective, an attempt to puncture complacency and the comforting fiction that borders, wealth, or modern medicine can fully insulate anyone. The subtext is about political behavior: pandemics expose the limits of sovereignty and the cost of delayed cooperation. If “all of humanity” is under threat, then hoarding resources, slow-walking transparency, or treating global health as charity becomes not just unethical but irrationally self-defeating.
Context matters here: Chan’s WHO years were shaped by SARS’s legacy and later crises like H1N1 and Ebola, when public trust, international coordination, and the legitimacy of global institutions were constantly tested. The sentence is an argument for solidarity, but it’s also an indictment. It implies that the true danger isn’t only the pathogen; it’s the human tendency to fragment into competing interests precisely when collective action is most necessary.
The phrase “really is” reads like a corrective, an attempt to puncture complacency and the comforting fiction that borders, wealth, or modern medicine can fully insulate anyone. The subtext is about political behavior: pandemics expose the limits of sovereignty and the cost of delayed cooperation. If “all of humanity” is under threat, then hoarding resources, slow-walking transparency, or treating global health as charity becomes not just unethical but irrationally self-defeating.
Context matters here: Chan’s WHO years were shaped by SARS’s legacy and later crises like H1N1 and Ebola, when public trust, international coordination, and the legitimacy of global institutions were constantly tested. The sentence is an argument for solidarity, but it’s also an indictment. It implies that the true danger isn’t only the pathogen; it’s the human tendency to fragment into competing interests precisely when collective action is most necessary.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Margaret
Add to List






