"After I became a citizen, I felt freer to say what I thought about this country, both negative and positive. I think I had been, consciously and subconsciously, biting my tongue in the past"
About this Quote
Freedom, in MacNeil's telling, is not a feeling you discover inside yourself; it's a credential you receive from the state. The line lands because it flips the patriotic script: citizenship isn't just belonging, it's permission. A journalist - professionally obligated to speak plainly - admits that even he was self-editing. That confession is the real indictment.
The intent is modest, almost practical: he is describing a shift in comfort after naturalization. But the subtext is sharper. "Biting my tongue" signals a silent calculus familiar to immigrants and long-term residents: praise is safe, critique is risky, and the risk isn't abstract. It's social (being labeled ungrateful), institutional (visa precarity, bureaucratic discretion), and psychological (the internalized sense that you're a guest in someone else's house). MacNeil is naming how democratic speech can be stratified - not by law alone, but by status.
Context matters because MacNeil isn't a firebrand; he's a public-service newsman associated with sober, consensus-minded broadcasting. When a figure like that admits to self-censorship, it punctures the myth that only the radical or marginalized feel pressure to perform loyalty. His phrasing - "both negative and positive" - is a journalist's balancing clause, but it also exposes the trap: immigrants are expected to be ambassadors of gratitude, not full participants in argument.
The quote works because it treats citizenship less as identity and more as a microphone turning on. It's a reminder that free speech is often experienced not as a principle, but as a threshold you have to cross.
The intent is modest, almost practical: he is describing a shift in comfort after naturalization. But the subtext is sharper. "Biting my tongue" signals a silent calculus familiar to immigrants and long-term residents: praise is safe, critique is risky, and the risk isn't abstract. It's social (being labeled ungrateful), institutional (visa precarity, bureaucratic discretion), and psychological (the internalized sense that you're a guest in someone else's house). MacNeil is naming how democratic speech can be stratified - not by law alone, but by status.
Context matters because MacNeil isn't a firebrand; he's a public-service newsman associated with sober, consensus-minded broadcasting. When a figure like that admits to self-censorship, it punctures the myth that only the radical or marginalized feel pressure to perform loyalty. His phrasing - "both negative and positive" - is a journalist's balancing clause, but it also exposes the trap: immigrants are expected to be ambassadors of gratitude, not full participants in argument.
The quote works because it treats citizenship less as identity and more as a microphone turning on. It's a reminder that free speech is often experienced not as a principle, but as a threshold you have to cross.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List





