"After I had been working as a cap maker for three years it began to dawn on me that we girls needed an organization. The men had organized already, and had gained some advantages, but the bosses had lost nothing, as they took it out on us"
About this Quote
Three years at the cap table is a long time to learn how exploitation works in stereo. Rose Schneiderman opens with the slow burn of lived experience: “it began to dawn on me” isn’t rhetorical modesty so much as a timeline of political awakening. Organizing doesn’t arrive as ideology; it arrives as pattern recognition, the moment you realize your individual endurance is being used as management strategy.
The quote’s bite is in its casual accounting of who pays for “advantages.” The men “organized already” and won gains, yet the bosses “lost nothing” because power is elastic: employers simply reroute the cost onto the least protected workers. Schneiderman is describing a workplace version of trickle-down cruelty, where reforms for one group become intensified pressure on another. That last clause - “they took it out on us” - compresses a whole system of gendered labor hierarchy into a single, blunt mechanism. Women’s wages, conditions, and dignity become the balancing sheet.
Context matters: Schneiderman was a garment worker turned labor leader in an industry notorious for long hours, unsafe shops, and immigrant women treated as disposable. Her era’s unions often mirrored the society’s sexism; even “progress” could be unevenly distributed. The intent is not merely to argue for unions, but to insist that women cannot rely on male organizing to save them. She’s making a strategic claim: if you’re the shock absorber of the labor market, you need your own leverage. In one tight paragraph, solidarity is reframed not as sentiment, but as self-defense.
The quote’s bite is in its casual accounting of who pays for “advantages.” The men “organized already” and won gains, yet the bosses “lost nothing” because power is elastic: employers simply reroute the cost onto the least protected workers. Schneiderman is describing a workplace version of trickle-down cruelty, where reforms for one group become intensified pressure on another. That last clause - “they took it out on us” - compresses a whole system of gendered labor hierarchy into a single, blunt mechanism. Women’s wages, conditions, and dignity become the balancing sheet.
Context matters: Schneiderman was a garment worker turned labor leader in an industry notorious for long hours, unsafe shops, and immigrant women treated as disposable. Her era’s unions often mirrored the society’s sexism; even “progress” could be unevenly distributed. The intent is not merely to argue for unions, but to insist that women cannot rely on male organizing to save them. She’s making a strategic claim: if you’re the shock absorber of the labor market, you need your own leverage. In one tight paragraph, solidarity is reframed not as sentiment, but as self-defense.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Rose
Add to List
