"After September 11, the European governments have completely failed. They are incapable of seeing beyond their own national scope of interests"
About this Quote
A European philosopher accusing European governments of parochialism after 9/11 isn’t just making a policy critique; he’s diagnosing a structural weakness in the continent’s political imagination. Habermas’s charge lands because it reframes “failure” away from security lapses or diplomatic missteps and toward a deeper incapacity: the inability to think and act at the scale the moment demands.
The specific intent is disciplinary and strategic. Habermas is pushing Europe toward post-national coordination, essentially arguing that terrorism, war, and the U.S.-led “war on terror” exposed how obsolete purely national reflexes had become. In 2001-2003, European capitals oscillated between solidarity with the United States and anxious distancing from American militarism, splitting dramatically over Iraq. Habermas reads that fragmentation not as healthy pluralism but as a continent stuck in small-state psychology while claiming global relevance.
The subtext is a provocation aimed at Europe’s self-image. Europe likes to see itself as the home of cosmopolitan norms, human rights, and multilateral restraint. Habermas is saying: you can’t market “Europe” as a moral project while governing like a cluster of competing domestic electorates. “Incapable of seeing beyond” is the knife twist; it implies not just unwillingness but a cognitive limitation produced by institutions that haven’t caught up with interdependence.
Context matters: Habermas’s broader project is the democratization of supranational power, especially the EU. Post-9/11 becomes his proof point that either Europe learns to act collectively with political legitimacy, or it will remain rhetorically grand and operationally irrelevant.
The specific intent is disciplinary and strategic. Habermas is pushing Europe toward post-national coordination, essentially arguing that terrorism, war, and the U.S.-led “war on terror” exposed how obsolete purely national reflexes had become. In 2001-2003, European capitals oscillated between solidarity with the United States and anxious distancing from American militarism, splitting dramatically over Iraq. Habermas reads that fragmentation not as healthy pluralism but as a continent stuck in small-state psychology while claiming global relevance.
The subtext is a provocation aimed at Europe’s self-image. Europe likes to see itself as the home of cosmopolitan norms, human rights, and multilateral restraint. Habermas is saying: you can’t market “Europe” as a moral project while governing like a cluster of competing domestic electorates. “Incapable of seeing beyond” is the knife twist; it implies not just unwillingness but a cognitive limitation produced by institutions that haven’t caught up with interdependence.
Context matters: Habermas’s broader project is the democratization of supranational power, especially the EU. Post-9/11 becomes his proof point that either Europe learns to act collectively with political legitimacy, or it will remain rhetorically grand and operationally irrelevant.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jurgen
Add to List



