"After they killed Uday and Qusay, the focus centered on Saddam: Find him, kill him, capture him, whatever it takes. To me, it was a false sense of security: If we get Saddam, we're going to win this war"
About this Quote
Karpinski’s line punctures one of war’s most seductive myths: that history can be solved by removing a single man. Spoken by a soldier who watched the Iraq War’s mission creep up close, the quote frames the post-Uday-and-Qusay moment as a pivot from messy reality to a cleaner, cinematic objective. “Find him, kill him, capture him” reads like a mantra, the kind of bureaucratic adrenaline that turns strategy into a scavenger hunt. The blunt “whatever it takes” is doing quiet damage here; it hints at how moral boundaries and institutional checks get softened when the target becomes symbolic rather than operational.
The subtext is an indictment of narrative warfare. “To me” matters: she’s flagging the gap between official confidence and field-level skepticism. Calling it a “false sense of security” suggests not just mistaken analysis, but a psychological need inside the coalition to believe there was an off-switch. Saddam becomes a proxy for victory itself, an attempt to compress an occupation, insurgency, and sectarian fracture into a single arrest photo.
Context makes the critique heavier. Karpinski is tied to the Abu Ghraib scandal, and her perspective carries the bitter knowledge of what “whatever it takes” can authorize when institutions prioritize results and optics. The quote isn’t pacifist; it’s realist. It argues that decapitation can satisfy headlines while failing to touch the systems, grievances, and power vacuums that actually determine whether a war ends - or metastasizes.
The subtext is an indictment of narrative warfare. “To me” matters: she’s flagging the gap between official confidence and field-level skepticism. Calling it a “false sense of security” suggests not just mistaken analysis, but a psychological need inside the coalition to believe there was an off-switch. Saddam becomes a proxy for victory itself, an attempt to compress an occupation, insurgency, and sectarian fracture into a single arrest photo.
Context makes the critique heavier. Karpinski is tied to the Abu Ghraib scandal, and her perspective carries the bitter knowledge of what “whatever it takes” can authorize when institutions prioritize results and optics. The quote isn’t pacifist; it’s realist. It argues that decapitation can satisfy headlines while failing to touch the systems, grievances, and power vacuums that actually determine whether a war ends - or metastasizes.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Janis
Add to List




