"Against logic there is no armor like ignorance"
About this Quote
There is a peculiar comfort in being wrong on purpose. Laurence J. Peter, best known for skewering workplace incompetence, nails a darker social truth here: logic is only persuasive to people who have already agreed to play by logic’s rules. Ignorance isn’t merely the absence of information; it can be a tactical posture, a self-sealing shield that turns evidence into background noise.
The line works because it flips the usual fantasy that reason is a weapon. We like to imagine logic as a battering ram capable of breaking through bad ideas. Peter argues the opposite: the real defensive technology isn’t counterargument, it’s refusal. Ignorance can’t be outmaneuvered because it doesn’t have to stay consistent, admit error, or even recognize the playing field. Logic depends on shared premises and a minimal respect for causality. Ignorance opts out of the contract.
Subtextually, it’s also a jab at the status games inside institutions. In offices, bureaucracies, and public debate, “not knowing” often isn’t innocent; it’s plausible deniability, a way to avoid responsibility while looking unthreatened by facts. That makes ignorance “armor” in the most political sense: it protects power from accountability.
Context matters: Peter wrote in an era increasingly dominated by managerial culture, where decisions were routinely insulated from consequences by layers of process. The joke lands because it’s not just about individuals being dim; it’s about systems that reward the appearance of certainty and punish the humility logic requires.
The line works because it flips the usual fantasy that reason is a weapon. We like to imagine logic as a battering ram capable of breaking through bad ideas. Peter argues the opposite: the real defensive technology isn’t counterargument, it’s refusal. Ignorance can’t be outmaneuvered because it doesn’t have to stay consistent, admit error, or even recognize the playing field. Logic depends on shared premises and a minimal respect for causality. Ignorance opts out of the contract.
Subtextually, it’s also a jab at the status games inside institutions. In offices, bureaucracies, and public debate, “not knowing” often isn’t innocent; it’s plausible deniability, a way to avoid responsibility while looking unthreatened by facts. That makes ignorance “armor” in the most political sense: it protects power from accountability.
Context matters: Peter wrote in an era increasingly dominated by managerial culture, where decisions were routinely insulated from consequences by layers of process. The joke lands because it’s not just about individuals being dim; it’s about systems that reward the appearance of certainty and punish the humility logic requires.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Laurence
Add to List









