"Alimony is the curse of the writing class"
About this Quote
Mailer’s line lands like a barstool proverb sharpened into a weapon: funny, mean, and revealing in what it assumes about who gets to write and at what cost. “Alimony” isn’t just a legal obligation here; it’s the invoice that arrives when the romance of the artist’s life collides with the paperwork of adulthood. By calling it “the curse,” Mailer frames domestic consequence as a kind of supernatural punishment visited on the “writing class,” as if novelists are a guild with its own special suffering - not the mundane burdens everyone else carries, but a uniquely artistic affliction.
The subtext is less about family law than about entitlement. Alimony presumes a past bargain: one partner’s labor (often unpaid, often feminized) enabling the other’s career, followed by a reckoning when the marriage ends. Mailer flips that reckoning into grievance, turning support into sabotage: money that might have financed time, risk, and ego now gets diverted to responsibility. The joke depends on a familiar masculine mythology of the writer as a man who needs freedom, disorder, and sexual latitude to produce work - and then resents the bill for the wreckage.
Context matters: Mailer’s era treated the Great Male Novelist as a public institution and wives as backstage infrastructure. Alimony threatened that arrangement by attaching a price to the “genius” lifestyle. The line works because it’s both self-mythologizing and self-incriminating: an attempt to make a personal consequence sound like a collective artistic tragedy, while accidentally spotlighting the hidden economy that made the writing class possible in the first place.
The subtext is less about family law than about entitlement. Alimony presumes a past bargain: one partner’s labor (often unpaid, often feminized) enabling the other’s career, followed by a reckoning when the marriage ends. Mailer flips that reckoning into grievance, turning support into sabotage: money that might have financed time, risk, and ego now gets diverted to responsibility. The joke depends on a familiar masculine mythology of the writer as a man who needs freedom, disorder, and sexual latitude to produce work - and then resents the bill for the wreckage.
Context matters: Mailer’s era treated the Great Male Novelist as a public institution and wives as backstage infrastructure. Alimony threatened that arrangement by attaching a price to the “genius” lifestyle. The line works because it’s both self-mythologizing and self-incriminating: an attempt to make a personal consequence sound like a collective artistic tragedy, while accidentally spotlighting the hidden economy that made the writing class possible in the first place.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Norman
Add to List



